TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of acute rehabilitation for kids in the PICU
T2 - A Canadian multicenter point prevalence study
AU - Choong, Karen
AU - Zorko, David J.
AU - Awojoodu, Ronke
AU - Ducharme-Crevier, Laurence
AU - Fontela, Patricia S.
AU - Lee, Laurie A.
AU - Guerguerian, Anne Marie
AU - Garcia Guerra, Gonzalo
AU - Krmpotic, Kristina
AU - McKelvie, Brianna
AU - Menon, Kusum
AU - Murthy, Srinivas
AU - Sehgal, Anupam
AU - Weiss, Matthew J.
AU - Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported, in part, by Johns Hopkins University Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Stimulating and Advancing ACCM Research Award. Dr. Choong’s institution received funding from Academic Health Science Centre Alternative Funding Plan Innovation Fund (Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization), and she received funding from McMaster University. Dr. Krmpotic’s institution received funding from Research Nova Scotia (formerly Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. For information regarding this article, E-mail: [email protected]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate mobilization practices, barriers, and mobility-related adverse events in Canadian PICUs. Design: National 2-day point prevalence study. Setting: Thirteen PICUs across Canada. Patients: Children with a minimum 72-hour PICU length of stay on the allocated study day. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Outcomes of interest were the prevalence and nature of mobilization activities, rehabilitation resources, adverse events, and factors associated with out-of-bed mobility and therapist-provided mobility. Two PICUs (15%) had early mobilization practice guidelines, and one PICU (8%) reported a formal process for engaging families in the mobilization of patients. The prevalence of mobilization was 110 of 137 patient-days (80%). The commonest activity was out-of-bed mobility (87/137; 64% patient-days); there was no active mobilization on 46 patient-days (34%). Therapists provided mobility on 33% of patient-days. Mobility was most commonly facilitated by nurses (74% events) and family (49% events). Family participation was strongly associated with out-of-bed mobility (odds ratio 6.4; p = 0.001). Intubated, mechanically ventilated patients were mobilized out-of-bed on 18 of 50 patient-days (36%). However, the presence of an endotracheal tube, vasoactive infusions, and age greater than or equal to 3 years were independently associated with not being mobilized out-of-bed. Barriers were reported on 58 of 137 patient-days (42%), and adverse events occurred in 22 of 387 mobility events (6%). Conclusions: Mobilization is common and safe, and the majority of children in Canadian PICUs are being mobilized out-of-bed, even when mechanically ventilated. Family engagement in PICU-based rehabilitation is increasing. This study provides encouraging evidence that common barriers can be overcome in order to safely mobilize children in PICUs.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate mobilization practices, barriers, and mobility-related adverse events in Canadian PICUs. Design: National 2-day point prevalence study. Setting: Thirteen PICUs across Canada. Patients: Children with a minimum 72-hour PICU length of stay on the allocated study day. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Outcomes of interest were the prevalence and nature of mobilization activities, rehabilitation resources, adverse events, and factors associated with out-of-bed mobility and therapist-provided mobility. Two PICUs (15%) had early mobilization practice guidelines, and one PICU (8%) reported a formal process for engaging families in the mobilization of patients. The prevalence of mobilization was 110 of 137 patient-days (80%). The commonest activity was out-of-bed mobility (87/137; 64% patient-days); there was no active mobilization on 46 patient-days (34%). Therapists provided mobility on 33% of patient-days. Mobility was most commonly facilitated by nurses (74% events) and family (49% events). Family participation was strongly associated with out-of-bed mobility (odds ratio 6.4; p = 0.001). Intubated, mechanically ventilated patients were mobilized out-of-bed on 18 of 50 patient-days (36%). However, the presence of an endotracheal tube, vasoactive infusions, and age greater than or equal to 3 years were independently associated with not being mobilized out-of-bed. Barriers were reported on 58 of 137 patient-days (42%), and adverse events occurred in 22 of 387 mobility events (6%). Conclusions: Mobilization is common and safe, and the majority of children in Canadian PICUs are being mobilized out-of-bed, even when mechanically ventilated. Family engagement in PICU-based rehabilitation is increasing. This study provides encouraging evidence that common barriers can be overcome in order to safely mobilize children in PICUs.
KW - critical care
KW - intensive care units
KW - occupational therapy
KW - pediatrics
KW - physical therapy
KW - rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102090856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102090856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002601
DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002601
M3 - Article
C2 - 33116069
AN - SCOPUS:85102090856
SN - 1529-7535
SP - 181
EP - 193
JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
ER -