TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy Following Initial Active Surveillance
AU - Reese, Adam C.
AU - Feng, Zhaoyong
AU - Landis, Patricia
AU - Trock, Bruce J.
AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.
AU - Carter, H. Ballentine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Objective To report pathologic outcomes and predictors of adverse pathology in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) after an initial period of active surveillance (AS). Methods We studied pathologic outcomes in men who underwent RP after some time on AS. Pathologic outcomes were compared between men with and without evidence of disease reclassification on AS. Rates of adverse pathology (defined as pathologic stage ≥pT3a, RP Gleason ≥4+3, or lymph node involvement) were determined and were compared depending on the variable that defined disease reclassification. Results Of 1086 men enrolled in AS, 130 (12.0%) underwent RP after a median time of 1.96 years (range, 0.55-12.26 years) on AS. Ninety-seven (74.6%) of these men had evidence of disease reclassification on AS. Rates of adverse pathology were greater in men with evidence of reclassification compared to those without (P =.05). Among men with disease reclassification, rates of adverse pathology ranged from 23.8% to 44.7% depending on the variable used to define reclassification. Longer time on AS was not associated with adverse pathology (P =.68). Conclusion Adverse pathology after RP is more common in men with evidence of disease reclassification on AS compared to those undergoing RP for other reasons. However, we identified varying outcomes among these patients depending on the criterion that defined reclassification. These data may enable identification of men who can safely continue on AS despite evidence of disease reclassification.
AB - Objective To report pathologic outcomes and predictors of adverse pathology in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) after an initial period of active surveillance (AS). Methods We studied pathologic outcomes in men who underwent RP after some time on AS. Pathologic outcomes were compared between men with and without evidence of disease reclassification on AS. Rates of adverse pathology (defined as pathologic stage ≥pT3a, RP Gleason ≥4+3, or lymph node involvement) were determined and were compared depending on the variable that defined disease reclassification. Results Of 1086 men enrolled in AS, 130 (12.0%) underwent RP after a median time of 1.96 years (range, 0.55-12.26 years) on AS. Ninety-seven (74.6%) of these men had evidence of disease reclassification on AS. Rates of adverse pathology were greater in men with evidence of reclassification compared to those without (P =.05). Among men with disease reclassification, rates of adverse pathology ranged from 23.8% to 44.7% depending on the variable used to define reclassification. Longer time on AS was not associated with adverse pathology (P =.68). Conclusion Adverse pathology after RP is more common in men with evidence of disease reclassification on AS compared to those undergoing RP for other reasons. However, we identified varying outcomes among these patients depending on the criterion that defined reclassification. These data may enable identification of men who can safely continue on AS despite evidence of disease reclassification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983494428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983494428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.039
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.039
M3 - Article
C2 - 26335496
AN - SCOPUS:84983494428
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 86
SP - 991
EP - 997
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 5
ER -