TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting survival in patients undergoing resection for locally recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma
T2 - A study and novel nomogram from TARPSWG
AU - Raut, Chandrajit P.
AU - Callegaro, Dario
AU - Miceli, Rosalba
AU - Barretta, Francesco
AU - Rutkowski, Piotr
AU - Blay, Jean Yves
AU - Lahat, Guy
AU - Strauss, Dirk C.
AU - Gonzalez, Ricardo
AU - Ahuja, Nita
AU - Grignani, Giovanni
AU - Quagliuolo, Vittorio
AU - Stoeckle, Eberhard
AU - De Paoli, Antonino
AU - Pillarisetty, Venu G.
AU - Nessim, Carolyn
AU - Swallow, Carol J.
AU - Bagaria, Sanjay
AU - Canter, Robert
AU - Mullen, John
AU - Gelderblom, Hans J.
AU - Pennacchioli, Elisabetta
AU - Van Coevorden, Frits
AU - Cardona, Kenneth
AU - Fiore, Marco
AU - Fairweather, Mark
AU - Gronchi, Alessandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019/4/15
Y1 - 2019/4/15
N2 - Purpose: The role of surgery for first relapse locally recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS-LR1) is uncertain. We report outcomes of the largest RPS-LR1 series and propose a new prognostic nomogram. Experimental Design: Patients with consecutive RPS-LR1 without distant metastases who underwent resection at 22 centers (2002-2011) were included. Endpoints were diseasefree and overall survival (DFS, OS) and crude-cumulativeincidence (CCI) of local/distant recurrence from second surgery. Nomograms predicting DFS and OS from second surgery were developed and validated (calibration plots); discrimination was assessed (Harrell C index). Results: Of 684 patients identified, full prognostic variable data were available for 602. Initial surgery for primary RPS was performed at our institutions in 188 patients (31%) and elsewhere in 414 (69%). At a median follow-up of 119 months [Interquartile range (IQR), 80-169] from initial surgery and 75 months (IQR 50-105) from second surgery, 6-year DFS and OS were 19.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0-23.0%] and 54.1% (95% CI, 49.8-58.8%), respectively. Recurrence patterns and survival probability were histology-specific, with liposarcoma subtypes having the highest 6-year CCI of second local recurrence (LR, 60.2%-70.9%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) having higher 6-year CCI of distant metastasis (DM, 36.3%). Nomograms included age at second surgery, multifocality, grade, completeness of second surgery, histology, chemotherapy/radiotherapy at first surgery, and number of organs resected at first surgery. OS and DFS nomograms showed good calibration and discriminative ability (C index 0.70 and 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: We developed nomograms to predict DFS and OS for patients undergoing RPS-LR1 resection. Nomograms provide individualized, disease-relevant estimations of survival for RPS-LR1 patients and assist in clinical decisions.
AB - Purpose: The role of surgery for first relapse locally recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS-LR1) is uncertain. We report outcomes of the largest RPS-LR1 series and propose a new prognostic nomogram. Experimental Design: Patients with consecutive RPS-LR1 without distant metastases who underwent resection at 22 centers (2002-2011) were included. Endpoints were diseasefree and overall survival (DFS, OS) and crude-cumulativeincidence (CCI) of local/distant recurrence from second surgery. Nomograms predicting DFS and OS from second surgery were developed and validated (calibration plots); discrimination was assessed (Harrell C index). Results: Of 684 patients identified, full prognostic variable data were available for 602. Initial surgery for primary RPS was performed at our institutions in 188 patients (31%) and elsewhere in 414 (69%). At a median follow-up of 119 months [Interquartile range (IQR), 80-169] from initial surgery and 75 months (IQR 50-105) from second surgery, 6-year DFS and OS were 19.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0-23.0%] and 54.1% (95% CI, 49.8-58.8%), respectively. Recurrence patterns and survival probability were histology-specific, with liposarcoma subtypes having the highest 6-year CCI of second local recurrence (LR, 60.2%-70.9%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) having higher 6-year CCI of distant metastasis (DM, 36.3%). Nomograms included age at second surgery, multifocality, grade, completeness of second surgery, histology, chemotherapy/radiotherapy at first surgery, and number of organs resected at first surgery. OS and DFS nomograms showed good calibration and discriminative ability (C index 0.70 and 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: We developed nomograms to predict DFS and OS for patients undergoing RPS-LR1 resection. Nomograms provide individualized, disease-relevant estimations of survival for RPS-LR1 patients and assist in clinical decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064918695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064918695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2700
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2700
M3 - Article
C2 - 30723141
AN - SCOPUS:85064918695
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 25
SP - 2664
EP - 2671
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 8
ER -