TY - JOUR
T1 - Pre- versus posttransplant treatment of hepatitis C virus with direct-acting antivirals in liver transplant recipients
T2 - More issues to be solved
AU - Abdelqader, Abdelhai
AU - Kabacam, Gokhan
AU - Woreta, Tinsay A.
AU - Hamilton, James P.
AU - Luu, Harry
AU - Al Khalloufi, Kawtar
AU - Saberi, Behnam
AU - Philosophe, Benjamin
AU - Cameron, Andrew M.
AU - Gurakar, Ahmet
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. We acknowledge support for the statistical analysis from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health through Grant Number 1UL1TR001079.
Publisher Copyright:
© Başkent University 2017 Printed in Turkey. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2017/2
Y1 - 2017/2
N2 - Objectives: Our goal was to investigate wait times related to hepatitis C virus treatment with directacting antivirals before versus after liver transplant at a single center as well as wait times for insurance approval for preemptive treatment with these agents after liver transplant. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated hepatitis C virus infections in transplant recipients of deceased liver donations in 2014 and 2015. Demographics, hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, and transplant wait times were compared between patients treated before or after liver transplant. Wait times to approval of direct-acting antiviral treatment were evaluated in those untreated before transplant. Results: During our study period, of 67 deceased-donor liver transplants, 21 patients received hepatitis C virus treatment pretransplant (treated group) and 46 patients were not treated pretransplant (untreated group). Twenty-five patients in the untreated group received hepatitis C virus-positive donations, with all in this group treated with direct-acting antivirals. We found no statistically significant differences regarding age, sex, race, donation after cardiac death, or incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma between groups. The treated group had a longer median wait time (287 vs 172 days; P =.02). Twelve of the 46 untreated patients (26.1%) developed biopsy-proven hepatitis C virus-related relapse (median 87 days; range, 55-383 days). Preemptive direct-acting antiviral therapy was initiated at a median of 81 days in the untreated group. Conclusions: Although treatment of hepatitis C virus before liver transplant is an attractive option to eliminate the risk of complications, it can limit the donor pool for recipients to uninfected donors, significantly increasing wait times in regions with large hepatitis C virus-positive donor pools. Allocation of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was not different between the treated and untreated groups. Insurance companies should revise their policies for rapid approval of preemptive direct-acting antiviral treatment after liver transplant.
AB - Objectives: Our goal was to investigate wait times related to hepatitis C virus treatment with directacting antivirals before versus after liver transplant at a single center as well as wait times for insurance approval for preemptive treatment with these agents after liver transplant. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated hepatitis C virus infections in transplant recipients of deceased liver donations in 2014 and 2015. Demographics, hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, and transplant wait times were compared between patients treated before or after liver transplant. Wait times to approval of direct-acting antiviral treatment were evaluated in those untreated before transplant. Results: During our study period, of 67 deceased-donor liver transplants, 21 patients received hepatitis C virus treatment pretransplant (treated group) and 46 patients were not treated pretransplant (untreated group). Twenty-five patients in the untreated group received hepatitis C virus-positive donations, with all in this group treated with direct-acting antivirals. We found no statistically significant differences regarding age, sex, race, donation after cardiac death, or incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma between groups. The treated group had a longer median wait time (287 vs 172 days; P =.02). Twelve of the 46 untreated patients (26.1%) developed biopsy-proven hepatitis C virus-related relapse (median 87 days; range, 55-383 days). Preemptive direct-acting antiviral therapy was initiated at a median of 81 days in the untreated group. Conclusions: Although treatment of hepatitis C virus before liver transplant is an attractive option to eliminate the risk of complications, it can limit the donor pool for recipients to uninfected donors, significantly increasing wait times in regions with large hepatitis C virus-positive donor pools. Allocation of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was not different between the treated and untreated groups. Insurance companies should revise their policies for rapid approval of preemptive direct-acting antiviral treatment after liver transplant.
KW - Therapy
KW - Transplant wait time
KW - Waiting list
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016633353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016633353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.L19
DO - 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.L19
M3 - Article
C2 - 28260422
AN - SCOPUS:85016633353
SN - 1304-0855
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
JF - Experimental and Clinical Transplantation
ER -