TY - JOUR
T1 - Postabortion care service availability, readiness, and access in Burkina Faso
T2 - results from linked female-facility cross-sectional data
AU - Onadja, Yentéma
AU - Compaoré, Rachidatou
AU - Yugbaré, Danielle Belemsaga
AU - Thomas, Haley L.
AU - Guiella, Georges
AU - Lougué, Siaka
AU - Ouedraogo, Henri Gautier
AU - Bazie, Fiacre
AU - Kouanda, Seni
AU - Moreau, Caroline
AU - Bell, Suzanne O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Little is known about postabortion care (PAC) services in Burkina Faso, despite PAC’s importance as an essential and life-saving component of emergency obstetric care. This study aims to evaluate PAC service availability, readiness, and accessibility in Burkina Faso. Methods: Data for this study come from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Burkina Faso project and the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA) conducted by the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé and the Ministry of Health. PMA data from a representative sample of women aged 15–49 (n = 6,385) were linked via GPS coordinates to HHFA facility data (n = 2,757), which included all public and private health facilities in Burkina Faso. We assessed readiness to provide basic and comprehensive PAC using the signal functions framework. We then calculated distance to facilities and examined percent within 5 kms of a facility with any PAC, basic PAC, and comprehensive PAC overall and by women’s background characteristics. Results: PAC services were available in 46.4% of health facilities nationwide; only 38.3% and 35.0% of eligible facilities had all basic and comprehensive PAC signal functions, respectively. Removal of retained products of conception was the most common missing signal function for both basic and comprehensive PAC, followed by provision of any contraception (basic) or any LARC (comprehensive). Nearly 85% of women lived within 5 km of a facility providing any PAC services, while 50.5% and 17.4% lived within 5 km of a facility providing all basic PAC and all comprehensive PAC signal functions, respectively. Women with more education, greater wealth, and those living in urban areas had greater odds of living within 5 km of a facility with offering PAC, basic PAC, or comprehensive PAC. Conclusions: Results indicate a need for increased PAC availability and readiness, prioritizing basic PAC services at the primary level—the main source of care for many women—which would reduce structural disparities in access. The current deficiencies in PAC signal a need for broader strengthening of the primary healthcare services in Burkina Faso to reduce the burden of unsafe abortion-related morbidity and mortality while improving maternal health outcomes more broadly.
AB - Background: Little is known about postabortion care (PAC) services in Burkina Faso, despite PAC’s importance as an essential and life-saving component of emergency obstetric care. This study aims to evaluate PAC service availability, readiness, and accessibility in Burkina Faso. Methods: Data for this study come from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Burkina Faso project and the Harmonized Health Facility Assessment (HHFA) conducted by the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé and the Ministry of Health. PMA data from a representative sample of women aged 15–49 (n = 6,385) were linked via GPS coordinates to HHFA facility data (n = 2,757), which included all public and private health facilities in Burkina Faso. We assessed readiness to provide basic and comprehensive PAC using the signal functions framework. We then calculated distance to facilities and examined percent within 5 kms of a facility with any PAC, basic PAC, and comprehensive PAC overall and by women’s background characteristics. Results: PAC services were available in 46.4% of health facilities nationwide; only 38.3% and 35.0% of eligible facilities had all basic and comprehensive PAC signal functions, respectively. Removal of retained products of conception was the most common missing signal function for both basic and comprehensive PAC, followed by provision of any contraception (basic) or any LARC (comprehensive). Nearly 85% of women lived within 5 km of a facility providing any PAC services, while 50.5% and 17.4% lived within 5 km of a facility providing all basic PAC and all comprehensive PAC signal functions, respectively. Women with more education, greater wealth, and those living in urban areas had greater odds of living within 5 km of a facility with offering PAC, basic PAC, or comprehensive PAC. Conclusions: Results indicate a need for increased PAC availability and readiness, prioritizing basic PAC services at the primary level—the main source of care for many women—which would reduce structural disparities in access. The current deficiencies in PAC signal a need for broader strengthening of the primary healthcare services in Burkina Faso to reduce the burden of unsafe abortion-related morbidity and mortality while improving maternal health outcomes more broadly.
KW - Abortion
KW - Burkina Faso
KW - Health facilities
KW - Postabortion care
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182419727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182419727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-023-10538-z
DO - 10.1186/s12913-023-10538-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 38233874
AN - SCOPUS:85182419727
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 24
JO - BMC health services research
JF - BMC health services research
IS - 1
M1 - 84
ER -