Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Porous polyethylene implant for skull base reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic literature review and institutional case series

  • Marco Galeazzi
  • , Simona Serioli
  • , Giorgia De Rosa
  • , Ludovico Agostini
  • , Federico Valeri
  • , Alberto Benato
  • , Sage Rahm
  • , Murad Sultanov
  • , Rosalinda Calandrelli
  • , Sabrina Chiloiro
  • , Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa
  • , Mario Rigante
  • , Liverana Lauretti
  • , Alessandro Olivi
  • , Francesco Doglietto
  • , Pier Paolo Mattogno

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Reconstruction of skull base (SB) defects following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) is critical to minimize postoperative complications. Porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor®) implants have been employed for this purpose; however, their long-term complication rates and osteointegration outcomes remain unclear. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across three databases, including studies involving SB reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants that reported complications and osteointegration outcomes. Additionally, a retrospective analysis was performed on 94 patients undergoing SB reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery with Medpor (2008–2024). Osteointegration was assessed via imaging and clinical outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, as well as intraoperative findings in reoperated cases. Eleven studies (691 patients) were included, with reported postoperative complications including CSF leaks (2.9%), infections (2.3%), and rare implant extrusion or osteointegration failures (0.4%). In the institutional cohort, 25 of 94 patients (26.6%) required reoperation, with 17 undergoing reoperation at least 6 months post-implantation. All these patients were reoperated for pathology recurrence, except for one who was reoperated for spontaneous Medpor extrusion. Among these, 94% (16/17) had no evidence of osteointegration. Chronic nasal symptoms were reported in 13.4% of non-reoperated patients, with no cases requiring implant removal. One of the 17 reoperated patient had an additional surgery due to spontaneous Medpor Extrusion. The placement of the nasoseptal flap to cover Medpor did not appear to have a facilitating effect on its osseointegration; however, its role will need to be further studied. Medpor implants demonstrate acceptable long-term safety for EEA skull base reconstruction, with low rates of major complications. However, osteointegration appears infrequent (< 8%) even over extended follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number137
JournalNeurosurgical Review
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Endoscopic endonasal surgery
  • Osteointegration
  • Porous polyethylene implant
  • Skull base reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Porous polyethylene implant for skull base reconstruction in transsphenoidal surgery: a systematic literature review and institutional case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this