TY - JOUR
T1 - Policy implications of the mental health treatment study
AU - Drake, Robert E.
AU - Frey, William
AU - Karakus, Mustafa
AU - Salkever, David
AU - Bond, Gary R.
AU - Goldman, Howard H.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - The Social Security Administration's Mental Health Treatment Study (MHTS) produced positive mental health, employment, and quality of life outcomes for people on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). The investigators discuss major policy implications. First, because integrated, evidence-based mental health and vocational services produced clinical and societal benefits, the authors recommend further service implementation for this population. Second, because provision of these services did not reduce SSDI rolls, the authors recommend future research on prevention (helping people avoid needing SSDI) rather than rehabilitation (helping beneficiaries leave SSDI). Third, because integrating mental health, vocational, and general medical services was extremely difficult, the authors recommend a multifaceted approach that includes streamlined funding and infrastructure for training and service integration. Fourth, because insurance coverage for people with disabilities during the MHTS (pre- Affordable Care Act) was chaotic, the authors recommend that financing strategies emphasize functional - not just traditional clinical - outcomes.
AB - The Social Security Administration's Mental Health Treatment Study (MHTS) produced positive mental health, employment, and quality of life outcomes for people on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). The investigators discuss major policy implications. First, because integrated, evidence-based mental health and vocational services produced clinical and societal benefits, the authors recommend further service implementation for this population. Second, because provision of these services did not reduce SSDI rolls, the authors recommend future research on prevention (helping people avoid needing SSDI) rather than rehabilitation (helping beneficiaries leave SSDI). Third, because integrating mental health, vocational, and general medical services was extremely difficult, the authors recommend a multifaceted approach that includes streamlined funding and infrastructure for training and service integration. Fourth, because insurance coverage for people with disabilities during the MHTS (pre- Affordable Care Act) was chaotic, the authors recommend that financing strategies emphasize functional - not just traditional clinical - outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989864440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989864440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500336
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500336
M3 - Article
C2 - 27247172
AN - SCOPUS:84989864440
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 67
SP - 1139
EP - 1141
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 10
ER -