Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Point-of-Care versus Central Laboratory Glucose Testing in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients

  • Robert S. Kramer
  • , Monica Palmeri
  • , Michael Robich
  • , Frances L. Lucas
  • , Robert Groom
  • , Timothy Hayes
  • , Marie Janoushek
  • , Joseph F. Rappold
  • , William L. Swartz
  • , Reed Quinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective. To determine the accuracy of the glucometer currently used for point-of-care testing (POCT) of blood glucose in our cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit (CTICU). Design. Prospective cohort study. Setting. Tertiary care community hospital affiliated with a school of medicine. Participants. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients. Measurements. Blood glucose levels obtained via POCT with a glucometer using fingerstick and radial artery blood samples were compared with values obtained via central laboratory testing of radial artery blood samples (gold standard) in 106 CABG patients on continuous insulin infusions (CII) upon arrival to the CTICU from the operating room and 102 CABG patients on CII in the CTICU 6 hours later. Results. Fingerstick POCT and central lab blood glucose values correlated well (r = 0.83 for admission and 0.86 for 6-hour values), but the mean values were significantly different as determined by paired t-tests. Upon arrival, the fingerstick POCT mean value was 120.9 mg/dL, while the central laboratory value was 127.9 mg/dL (P value = 0.03). At the 6-hour time point, the mean value for fingerstick POCT was 129.7 mg/dL compared to a central laboratory value of 137.3 (P value = 0.02). Conclusion. The blood glucose POCT values correlated well with central laboratory values, but the values were statistically significantly different. Nevertheless, accurate clinical decisions were made despite the inaccuracies of POCT glucose testing, as experienced bedside nurses were able to use the glucometer successfully and safely. The device’s results informed them when the blood glucose was out of a prescibed range and the direction of the change, and they were able to adjust the CII accordingly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Glucose management
  • Point-of-care testing
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Point-of-Care versus Central Laboratory Glucose Testing in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this