TY - JOUR
T1 - Please Be Careful with Me
T2 - Discrepancies between Adolescent Expectations and Clinician Perspectives on the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
AU - Trent, Maria
AU - Recto, Michelle
AU - Qian, Qiang
AU - Butz, Arlene
AU - Frick, Kevin D.
AU - Ellen, Jonathan M.
AU - Lehmann, Harold
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the following grants: K01 DP001128/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS /United States, R01 NR013507/NR/NINR NIH HHS /United States, 5P20 MD00198-10/MD/NIMHD NIH HHS /United States.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the following grants: K01 DP001128/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States, R01 NR013507/NR/NINR NIH HHS/United States, 5P20 MD00198-10/MD/NIMHD NIH HHS/United States.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Study Objective: To compare clinician perspectives for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) with those of adolescent patients and parents. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Urban academic pediatric and adolescent medicine practices and school-based health clinics in a large urban community with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and a national sample of adolescent-serving clinicians. Participants: Female patients aged 12-19 years, parents raising an adolescent older than the age of 12 years in the urban community, and clinicians who serve adolescents recruited from regional and national listservs. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analogue scale scores on a scale of 0-10 corresponding to preferences on patient disposition in 17 clinical scenarios for a hypothetical patient with PID. Results: Compared with adolescents, clinicians were significantly more likely to endorse hospitalizations when patients presented with severe or complicated illness (β = 0.9; standard error [SE], 0.22; P <.001), possible surgical emergency (β = 0.83; SE, 0.2; P <.001), concurrent pregnancy (β = 0.59; SE, 0.3; P =.046), or failure of outpatient treatment (β = 0.58; SE, 0.29; P =.045). Compared with clinicians, adolescents were significantly more likely to endorse hospitalizations when patients presented at a young age (β = 1.36; SE, 0.38; P <.001), were homeless (β = 0.88; SE, 0.32; P =.007), were afraid to inform a partner (β = 1.66; SE, 0.40; P <.001), or had unaware parents (β = 2.86; SE, 0.39; P <.001). Conclusion: Clinicians were more likely to recommend hospitalization when doing so adhered to national guidelines on PID treatment. Adolescents opted for hospitalization more often than clinicians in scenarios in which patients exhibited social vulnerability. Clinicians should engage with adolescents in shared disposition planning and use a more nuanced approach to PID management for adolescents who might not be able to tolerate an outpatient regimen.
AB - Study Objective: To compare clinician perspectives for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) with those of adolescent patients and parents. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Urban academic pediatric and adolescent medicine practices and school-based health clinics in a large urban community with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and a national sample of adolescent-serving clinicians. Participants: Female patients aged 12-19 years, parents raising an adolescent older than the age of 12 years in the urban community, and clinicians who serve adolescents recruited from regional and national listservs. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analogue scale scores on a scale of 0-10 corresponding to preferences on patient disposition in 17 clinical scenarios for a hypothetical patient with PID. Results: Compared with adolescents, clinicians were significantly more likely to endorse hospitalizations when patients presented with severe or complicated illness (β = 0.9; standard error [SE], 0.22; P <.001), possible surgical emergency (β = 0.83; SE, 0.2; P <.001), concurrent pregnancy (β = 0.59; SE, 0.3; P =.046), or failure of outpatient treatment (β = 0.58; SE, 0.29; P =.045). Compared with clinicians, adolescents were significantly more likely to endorse hospitalizations when patients presented at a young age (β = 1.36; SE, 0.38; P <.001), were homeless (β = 0.88; SE, 0.32; P =.007), were afraid to inform a partner (β = 1.66; SE, 0.40; P <.001), or had unaware parents (β = 2.86; SE, 0.39; P <.001). Conclusion: Clinicians were more likely to recommend hospitalization when doing so adhered to national guidelines on PID treatment. Adolescents opted for hospitalization more often than clinicians in scenarios in which patients exhibited social vulnerability. Clinicians should engage with adolescents in shared disposition planning and use a more nuanced approach to PID management for adolescents who might not be able to tolerate an outpatient regimen.
KW - Adolescent behavior
KW - Attitudes of health personnel
KW - Health care surveys
KW - Pelvic inflammatory disease
KW - Sexually transmitted diseases
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066462557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066462557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 30974212
AN - SCOPUS:85066462557
SN - 1083-3188
VL - 32
SP - 363
EP - 367
JO - Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
JF - Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
IS - 4
ER -