TY - JOUR
T1 - Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults
AU - Torke, Alexia M.
AU - Siegler, Mark
AU - Abalos, Anna
AU - Moloney, Rachael M.
AU - Alexander, G. Caleb
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Dr. Alexander is a Robert Wood Johnson Faculty Scholar and is also supported by a career development award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08 HS15699–01A1). Dr. Torke was supported by a training grant from the Health Resources and Services Administration, D55HP03365–02–00, and is currently supported by a Hartford Geriatric Health Research Outcomes Scholars Award. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - Background: Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians' approaches to surrogate decision making. Objective: To describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults. Design: Cross-sectional written survey. Participants: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals. Measurements: Key features of physicians' most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician's reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action. Results: Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14-1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30-1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29-0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30-0.94). Conclusion: Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.
AB - Background: Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians' approaches to surrogate decision making. Objective: To describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults. Design: Cross-sectional written survey. Participants: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals. Measurements: Key features of physicians' most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician's reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action. Results: Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14-1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30-1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29-0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30-0.94). Conclusion: Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.
KW - Communication
KW - Decision making
KW - Ethics
KW - Proxy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949221449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949221449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y
DO - 10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 19633896
AN - SCOPUS:68949221449
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 24
SP - 1023
EP - 1028
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 9
ER -