Perspectives on neuroradiology medical expert testimony: Fact and fiction

D. M. Yousem, G. H. Zoarski, A. S. Mark, E. S. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


There are numerous misconceptions about serving as a medical malpractice expert witness. By maintaining an objective perspective based in the unbiased interpretation of the images provided (for both sides of the conflict), one can best serve society as a whole. Most cases for which a neuroradiology expert is recruited are the following: 1) not with the radiologist as a defendant, 2) resolved without court testimony, and 3) short-lived if frivolous. One can learn much about medicine, our nonradiology colleagues, and the litigation process by participating as an expert witness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2177-2181
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on neuroradiology medical expert testimony: Fact and fiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this