Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties

Shwetha Mudalegundi, Marisa Clifton, Scott Lifchez, Dawn LaPorte, Saras Ramanathan, Ahmed H. Sabit, Fasika Woreta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With the advent of virtual interviews, the potential for interview hoarding by applicants became of greater concern due to lack of financial constraints associated with in-person interviewing. Simultaneously, the average number of applications submitted each year is rising. Currently there is no cap to the number of applications or interviews an applicant may complete when applying to residency, with the exception of ophthalmology with a cap of 15 interviews. No studies have assessed the applicants’ perspectives on an application or interview cap. We assessed the attitudes of surgical subspecialty applicants towards capping, which may be useful when considering innovations in residency selection. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: About 1841 applicants to the Johns Hopkins’ ophthalmology, urology, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery residency programs from the 2022-2023 cycle were invited to respond to a 22-item questionnaire. Statistical analyses of aggregate data were conducted using R. RESULTS: Of the 776/1841 (42%) responses, 288 (40%) were in support of an application cap, while 455 (63%) were in support of an interview cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), taking a gap year (p = 0.02), medical school region (p = 0.04), and number of interviews accepted off of a waitlist (p = 0.01) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an application cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), USMLE Step 1 score (p = 0.004), number of interviews (p < 0.001), and number of programs ranked (p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an interview cap. Of those applicants who were in support of the respective caps they believed that on average a cap should consist of 48.1 (16.1) applications and 16.0 (8.0) interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the desire for interview caps among the majority of applicants to surgical subspecialties and thus this innovation may be considered by other specialties in the era of virtual interviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1013-1023
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of surgical education
Volume81
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • interview cap
  • interview hoarding
  • residency match
  • residency selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this