TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of Recent Ophthalmology Residency Graduates Regarding Preparation for Practice
AU - McDonnell, Peter J.
AU - Kirwan, Thomas J.
AU - Brinton, Gregory S.
AU - Golnik, Karl C.
AU - Melendez, Robert F.
AU - Parke, David W.
AU - Renucci, Ann
AU - Smith, Jennifer Hasenyager
AU - Smith, Ronald E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, to the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute.
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - Objective: To evaluate young ophthalmologists' perceptions of how well residency training prepared them for various aspects of their clinical practice. Design: Self-administered survey. Participants: Two hundred sixty-nine United States ophthalmologists who have been in practice for ≤5 years. Methods: A 4-page questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample of 900 U.S. members and fellows of the American Academy of Ophthalmology who had been in practice for ≤5 years. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of perceived preparedness in clinical and nonclinical areas of ophthalmology practice. Results: Two hundred sixty-nine surveys were completed and returned (margin of error, ±5%). Analysis of tabulated results indicated that 86% said they were extremely or very well prepared to practice comprehensive ophthalmology after residency training. Even so, about half of those respondents also desired some additional clinical training, and two thirds felt the need for some additional training in surgical areas (refractive, oculoplastics/orbital, glaucoma, retina, and pediatric ophthalmic surgery). At least 60% reported being not very or not at all well prepared in 6 of the nonclinical areas explored (business operations and finance, personal financial management, practice management skills, coding and reimbursement, political advocacy, and exposure to practice setting models). With the exception of personal financial management, most ophthalmologists thought training in all of these nonclinical areas was the responsibility of the residency training program. Conclusion: The transition from residency training to successful, efficient, ethical, high-quality ophthalmic practice demands a number of skills in addition to diagnostic acumen and surgical ability. In general, the U.S. residency program graduates surveyed are comfortable with their clinical training, but less so with their training in nonclinical areas. Opportunities to help ophthalmologists prepare better for the transition to clinical practice after training appear to exist and might be addressed by training programs, professional organizations, informal physician networks, and other stakeholders.
AB - Objective: To evaluate young ophthalmologists' perceptions of how well residency training prepared them for various aspects of their clinical practice. Design: Self-administered survey. Participants: Two hundred sixty-nine United States ophthalmologists who have been in practice for ≤5 years. Methods: A 4-page questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample of 900 U.S. members and fellows of the American Academy of Ophthalmology who had been in practice for ≤5 years. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of perceived preparedness in clinical and nonclinical areas of ophthalmology practice. Results: Two hundred sixty-nine surveys were completed and returned (margin of error, ±5%). Analysis of tabulated results indicated that 86% said they were extremely or very well prepared to practice comprehensive ophthalmology after residency training. Even so, about half of those respondents also desired some additional clinical training, and two thirds felt the need for some additional training in surgical areas (refractive, oculoplastics/orbital, glaucoma, retina, and pediatric ophthalmic surgery). At least 60% reported being not very or not at all well prepared in 6 of the nonclinical areas explored (business operations and finance, personal financial management, practice management skills, coding and reimbursement, political advocacy, and exposure to practice setting models). With the exception of personal financial management, most ophthalmologists thought training in all of these nonclinical areas was the responsibility of the residency training program. Conclusion: The transition from residency training to successful, efficient, ethical, high-quality ophthalmic practice demands a number of skills in addition to diagnostic acumen and surgical ability. In general, the U.S. residency program graduates surveyed are comfortable with their clinical training, but less so with their training in nonclinical areas. Opportunities to help ophthalmologists prepare better for the transition to clinical practice after training appear to exist and might be addressed by training programs, professional organizations, informal physician networks, and other stakeholders.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846477781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846477781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.027
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 17187862
AN - SCOPUS:33846477781
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 114
SP - 387-391.e3
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 2
ER -