Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers to Measuring and Improving Quality in Palliative Care Programs

Kamini Kuchinad, Ritu Sharma, Sarina R. Isenberg, Nebras Abu Al Hamayel, Sallie J. Weaver, Junya Zhu, Susan M. Hannum, Arif H. Kamal, Anne M. Walling, Karl A. Lorenz, Jonathan Ailon, Sydney M. Dy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To examine perceptions of facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs and differences by professional and leadership roles. Methods: We surveyed team members in diverse US and Canadian palliative care programs using a validated survey addressing teamwork and communication and constructs for educational support and training, leadership, infrastructure, and prioritization for quality measurement and improvement. We defined key facilitators as constructs rated ≥4 (agree) and key barriers as those ≤3 (disagree) on 1 to 5 scales. We conducted multivariable linear regressions for associations between key facilitators and barriers and (1) professional and (2) leadership roles, controlling for key program and respondent factors and clustering by program. Results: We surveyed 103 respondents in 11 programs; 45.6% were physicians and 50% had leadership roles. Key facilitators across sites included teamwork, communication, the implementation climate (or environment), and program focus on quality improvement. Key barriers included educational support and incentives, particularly for quality measurement, and quality improvement infrastructure such as strategies, systems, and skilled staff. In multivariable analyses, perceptions did not differ by leadership role, but physicians and nurse practitioners/nurses/physician assistants rated most constructs statistically significantly more negatively than other team members, especially for quality improvement (6 of the 7 key constructs). Conclusions: Although participants rated quality improvement focus and environment highly, key barriers included lack of infrastructure, especially for quality measurement. Building on these facilitators and measuring and addressing these barriers might help programs enhance palliative care quality initiatives’ acceptability, particularly for physicians and nurses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1028
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume37
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2020

Keywords

  • palliative care
  • quality
  • quality improvement
  • quality measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers to Measuring and Improving Quality in Palliative Care Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this