TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns and Predictors of Incident Return to HIV Care Among Traced, Disengaged Patients in Zambia
T2 - Analysis of a Prospective Cohort
AU - Beres, Laura K.
AU - Schwartz, Sheree
AU - Simbeza, Sandra
AU - McGready, John
AU - Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid
AU - Mwamba, Chanda
AU - Sikombe, Kombatende
AU - Topp, Stephanie M.
AU - Somwe, Paul
AU - Mody, Aaloke
AU - Mukamba, Njekwa
AU - Ehrenkranz, Peter D.
AU - Padian, Nancy
AU - Pry, Jake
AU - Moore, Carolyn Bolton
AU - Holmes, Charles B.
AU - Sikazwe, Izukanji
AU - Denison, Julie A.
AU - Geng, Elvin
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31MH109378. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This research was also supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grant Number OPP1105071 and the Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research P30AI094189.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background:Dynamic movement of patients in and out of HIV care is prevalent, but there is limited information on patterns of patient re-engagement or predictors of return to guide HIV programs to better support patient engagement.Methods:From a probability-based sample of lost to follow-up, adult patients traced by peer educators from 31 Zambian health facilities, we prospectively followed disengaged HIV patients for return clinic visits. We estimated the cumulative incidence of return and the time to return using Kaplan-Meier methods. We used univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to conduct a risk factor analysis identifying predictors of incident return across a social ecological framework.Results:Of the 556 disengaged patients, 73.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.0 to 83.8] returned to HIV care. The median follow-up time from disengagement was 32.3 months (interquartile range: 23.6-38.9). The rate of return decreased with time postdisengagement. Independent predictors of incident return included a previous gap in care [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 1.95, 95% CI: 1.23 to 3.09] and confronting a stigmatizer once in the past year (aHR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.65). Compared with a rural facility, patients were less likely to return if they sought care from an urban facility (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.96) or hospital (aHR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.82).Conclusions:Interventions are needed to hasten re-engagement in HIV care. Early and differential interventions by time since disengagement may improve intervention effectiveness. Patients in urban and tertiary care settings may need additional support. Improving patient resilience, outreach after a care gap, and community stigma reduction may facilitate return. Future re-engagement research should include causal evaluation of identified factors.
AB - Background:Dynamic movement of patients in and out of HIV care is prevalent, but there is limited information on patterns of patient re-engagement or predictors of return to guide HIV programs to better support patient engagement.Methods:From a probability-based sample of lost to follow-up, adult patients traced by peer educators from 31 Zambian health facilities, we prospectively followed disengaged HIV patients for return clinic visits. We estimated the cumulative incidence of return and the time to return using Kaplan-Meier methods. We used univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to conduct a risk factor analysis identifying predictors of incident return across a social ecological framework.Results:Of the 556 disengaged patients, 73.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.0 to 83.8] returned to HIV care. The median follow-up time from disengagement was 32.3 months (interquartile range: 23.6-38.9). The rate of return decreased with time postdisengagement. Independent predictors of incident return included a previous gap in care [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 1.95, 95% CI: 1.23 to 3.09] and confronting a stigmatizer once in the past year (aHR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.65). Compared with a rural facility, patients were less likely to return if they sought care from an urban facility (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.96) or hospital (aHR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.82).Conclusions:Interventions are needed to hasten re-engagement in HIV care. Early and differential interventions by time since disengagement may improve intervention effectiveness. Patients in urban and tertiary care settings may need additional support. Improving patient resilience, outreach after a care gap, and community stigma reduction may facilitate return. Future re-engagement research should include causal evaluation of identified factors.
KW - HIV
KW - Zambia
KW - antiretroviral therapy
KW - retention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102090637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102090637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002554
DO - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002554
M3 - Article
C2 - 33149000
AN - SCOPUS:85102090637
SN - 1525-4135
VL - 86
SP - 313
EP - 322
JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
IS - 3
ER -