TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported assessment of functional gait outcomes following superior gluteal artery perforator reconstruction
AU - Hur, Kevin
AU - Ohkuma, Rika
AU - Bellamy, Justin L.
AU - Yamazaki, Michiyo
AU - Manahan, Michele A.
AU - Rad, Ariel N.
AU - Cooney, Damon S.
AU - Rosson, Gedge D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2013 American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2013/8/14
Y1 - 2013/8/14
N2 - Background: Harvesting the superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap involves dissection of vessels through the gluteal muscle, potentially compromising gait and ambulation. We compared patient-reported gait and ambulation problems between SGAP flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions. Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent bilateral free flap breast reconstruction (17 SGAP, 26 DIEP) participated in the study. The Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) was administered with a supplementary section evaluating gait, balance, fatigue, and pain. Patients evaluated how they felt 2 months postoperatively and at time of survey administration. Multivariate regressions were fit to assess association between type of reconstruction and self-reported lower extremity function controlling for potential confounding factors. Results: Although there was no significant difference in overall LEFS between the cohorts on the date of survey, the SGAP patients reported greater difficulty performing the following activities after surgery (P < 0.05): work, usual hobbies, squatting, walking a mile, walking up stairs, sitting for an hour, running, turning, and hopping. The SGAP patients also reported easier fatigue (P < 0.01) both during the early postoperative period and on the date of survey. Conclusions: SGAP flap surgery causes no statistically significant differences in overall LEFS. However, SGAP patients did report donor-site morbidity with decreased ability to perform certain activities and increased fatigue and pain in the longer follow-up period. We feel that patients should be educated regarding gait issues and undergo physical therapy during the early postoperative period.
AB - Background: Harvesting the superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap involves dissection of vessels through the gluteal muscle, potentially compromising gait and ambulation. We compared patient-reported gait and ambulation problems between SGAP flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions. Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent bilateral free flap breast reconstruction (17 SGAP, 26 DIEP) participated in the study. The Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) was administered with a supplementary section evaluating gait, balance, fatigue, and pain. Patients evaluated how they felt 2 months postoperatively and at time of survey administration. Multivariate regressions were fit to assess association between type of reconstruction and self-reported lower extremity function controlling for potential confounding factors. Results: Although there was no significant difference in overall LEFS between the cohorts on the date of survey, the SGAP patients reported greater difficulty performing the following activities after surgery (P < 0.05): work, usual hobbies, squatting, walking a mile, walking up stairs, sitting for an hour, running, turning, and hopping. The SGAP patients also reported easier fatigue (P < 0.01) both during the early postoperative period and on the date of survey. Conclusions: SGAP flap surgery causes no statistically significant differences in overall LEFS. However, SGAP patients did report donor-site morbidity with decreased ability to perform certain activities and increased fatigue and pain in the longer follow-up period. We feel that patients should be educated regarding gait issues and undergo physical therapy during the early postoperative period.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881322478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881322478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0b013e3182a3329f
DO - 10.1097/GOX.0b013e3182a3329f
M3 - Article
C2 - 25289225
AN - SCOPUS:84881322478
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 1
JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
IS - 5
M1 - e31
ER -