TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient Experiences With a Multidisciplinary Fibroid Program
AU - Musselman, Kelsey
AU - Shin, Ja Hyun
AU - Lamparello, Nicole A.
AU - Ahsan, Muhammad Danyal
AU - Havryliuk, Yelena
AU - Schiffman, Marc
AU - Fenster, Tamatha
AU - Pepin, Kristen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 AAGL
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Study Objective: Although medical, interventional, and surgical treatment options for fibroids have expanded over the last decade, many patients are not thoroughly counseled about all available therapies. Patients desire a more comprehensive approach with shared decision-making tailored to their health goals. The aim of this study is to assess patient knowledge regarding treatment options before and after consultation with a multidisciplinary fibroid center. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting: Academic medical center in New York, NY. Patients and Participants: Patients who presented for initial consultation with a multidisciplinary fibroid program from July 2021 through January 2022. Interventions: Patients were offered same-day office consultation with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon (MIGS) followed by a telemedicine visit with an interventional radiologist (IR) within 3 weeks of the appointment request. Collaborative discussions were held between providers regarding patient care. Patients were asked to complete the survey following both appointments. Data was collected regarding demographics, prior evaluation of fibroids, knowledge about treatment options, and overall experience. Results: A total of 102 patients completed the survey (response rate 77%). A majority (55.9%) had known about their fibroids for at least 2 years. Most patients sought out the fibroid program for a 2nd (28.4%), 3rd (22.5%) or 4th (7.8%) opinion. Notably, 35.3% of patients who had previously been seen by an obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) were not offered any treatment. Of those who had been offered treatment, 24.5% were counseled on medical management with oral contraceptives, 28.4% on surgical options, and 5.9% on uterine artery embolization. Nearly all patients (86.3%) endorsed that they would not have sought 2 separate consultations had it not been for the program. Patients were overall well-informed after their experience, with 95.1% reporting they were more knowledgeable about their options and none reporting the 2 separate consults created more confusion for them. Conclusion: Many patients with symptomatic fibroids seeking secondary opinions have not been adequately counseled on fibroid management options. A collaborative approach to fibroid management better educates patients, provides an opportunity to be thoroughly counseled by the specialists performing either surgical or interventional procedures, and increases patient knowledge about fibroid treatment options.
AB - Study Objective: Although medical, interventional, and surgical treatment options for fibroids have expanded over the last decade, many patients are not thoroughly counseled about all available therapies. Patients desire a more comprehensive approach with shared decision-making tailored to their health goals. The aim of this study is to assess patient knowledge regarding treatment options before and after consultation with a multidisciplinary fibroid center. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting: Academic medical center in New York, NY. Patients and Participants: Patients who presented for initial consultation with a multidisciplinary fibroid program from July 2021 through January 2022. Interventions: Patients were offered same-day office consultation with a minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon (MIGS) followed by a telemedicine visit with an interventional radiologist (IR) within 3 weeks of the appointment request. Collaborative discussions were held between providers regarding patient care. Patients were asked to complete the survey following both appointments. Data was collected regarding demographics, prior evaluation of fibroids, knowledge about treatment options, and overall experience. Results: A total of 102 patients completed the survey (response rate 77%). A majority (55.9%) had known about their fibroids for at least 2 years. Most patients sought out the fibroid program for a 2nd (28.4%), 3rd (22.5%) or 4th (7.8%) opinion. Notably, 35.3% of patients who had previously been seen by an obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) were not offered any treatment. Of those who had been offered treatment, 24.5% were counseled on medical management with oral contraceptives, 28.4% on surgical options, and 5.9% on uterine artery embolization. Nearly all patients (86.3%) endorsed that they would not have sought 2 separate consultations had it not been for the program. Patients were overall well-informed after their experience, with 95.1% reporting they were more knowledgeable about their options and none reporting the 2 separate consults created more confusion for them. Conclusion: Many patients with symptomatic fibroids seeking secondary opinions have not been adequately counseled on fibroid management options. A collaborative approach to fibroid management better educates patients, provides an opportunity to be thoroughly counseled by the specialists performing either surgical or interventional procedures, and increases patient knowledge about fibroid treatment options.
KW - Fibroid management
KW - Interventional radiology
KW - Patient satisfaction
KW - Perspectives
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194165884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194165884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 38677410
AN - SCOPUS:85194165884
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 31
SP - 592-600.e2
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
IS - 7
ER -