TY - JOUR
T1 - Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants
T2 - Legal considerations
AU - Robertson, John A.
AU - Fost, Norman
PY - 1976/5
Y1 - 1976/5
N2 - The recent increase in reporting of passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants has not been accompanied by extensive analysis of the legality of the practice or the appropriateness of current law. There appears to be criminal liability on several grounds for parents, physicians, nurses, and administrators. Such liability may include charges of homicide by omission, child neglect, and failure to report child neglect. Increasing public exposure of the practice increases the probability that such prosecutions may be brought. Individuals involved in such decisions should be aware of their possible legal liability. If existing legal policy is inappropriate, it should be changed through open discussion and not subverted through private action. Two alternative policies are described: establishment of criteria for the class of infants who can be allowed to die or a better process of decision making. We conclude that a commitment to process would be preferable.
AB - The recent increase in reporting of passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants has not been accompanied by extensive analysis of the legality of the practice or the appropriateness of current law. There appears to be criminal liability on several grounds for parents, physicians, nurses, and administrators. Such liability may include charges of homicide by omission, child neglect, and failure to report child neglect. Increasing public exposure of the practice increases the probability that such prosecutions may be brought. Individuals involved in such decisions should be aware of their possible legal liability. If existing legal policy is inappropriate, it should be changed through open discussion and not subverted through private action. Two alternative policies are described: establishment of criteria for the class of infants who can be allowed to die or a better process of decision making. We conclude that a commitment to process would be preferable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017098488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017098488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3476(76)81138-9
DO - 10.1016/S0022-3476(76)81138-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 11662998
AN - SCOPUS:0017098488
SN - 0022-3476
VL - 88
SP - 883
EP - 889
JO - The Journal of pediatrics
JF - The Journal of pediatrics
IS - 5
ER -