Pain assessment: Differences in quality and intensity of the words pain, ache and hurt

Fannie Gaston-Johansson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

A study was undertaken to investigate if the concepts pain, ache and hurt differ from each other in intensity and quality and to identify discriminating semantic correlates for each of these concepts. Forty-one nurses with different backgrounds in nursing and 12 patients with chronic pain syndrome were included in the study. The methods used were a questionnaire, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). There was a statistically significant difference in the intensity of the words pain, ache and hurt on both the VAS and the MPQ. Pain was shown to have the highest intensity, followed by ache with hurt having the lowest. Semantic correlates consisting of sensory and affective words which best discriminate between the concepts pain, ache and hurt were identified. Semantic correlates for pain were: cutting, crushing, tearing, sharp, dreadful, killing, torturing and suffocating: for ache were: aching, pulling, gnawing, irritating, annoying, troublesome, exhausting, unbearable and terrifying; for hurt were: pricking, pinching, stinging, sore, fearful, unhappy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1984
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pain assessment: Differences in quality and intensity of the words pain, ache and hurt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this