Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of hemodialysis catheters placed by interventional radiologists with those placed by surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcomes were retrospectively analyzed of 237 hemodialysis catheters placed in 140 patients by a radiology service from January 1991 through December 1992. Follow-up data were available for 222 catheters (94%). Catheter secondary patency and freedom from infection were analyzed statistically and by means of life-table analysis. RESULTS: Pneumothorax occurred after the placement of six catheters (2.5%); in two patients, a chest tube was required for decompression. Other short-term complications included air embolism with no clinical sequelae (two procedures) and prolonged oozing from the tunnel (two procedures). Long-term complications included infection and catheter failure. Infection occurred in 26 patients (18%) with 32 catheters (14%) and resulted in removal of 25 catheters. Ninety-three catheters (42%) failed, and 63 catheters (28%) were removed because of failure. CONCLUSION: Hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists do not have a higher rate of complications or failure than catheters placed by surgeons.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 467-472 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | RADIOLOGY |
| Volume | 198 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1996 |
Keywords
- Catheters and catheterization, central venous access
- Catheters and catheterization, complications
- Dialysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS