Optimal molecular profiling of tissue and tissue components: Defining the best processing and microdissection methods for biomedical applications

G. Steven Bova, Isam A. Eltoum, John A. Kiernan, Gene P. Siegal, Andra R. Frost, Carolyn J.M. Best, John W. Gillespie, Gloria H. Su, Michael R. Emmert-Buck

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Isolation of well-preserved pure cell populations is a prerequisite for sound studies of the molecular basis of any tissue-based biological phenomenon. This article reviews current methods for obtaining anatomically specific signals from molecules isolated from tissues, a basic requirement for productive linking of phenotype and genotype. The quality of samples isolated from tissue and used for molecular analysis is often glossed over or omitted from publications, making interpretation and replication of data difficult or impossible. Fortunately, recently developed techniques allow life scientists to better document and control the quality of samples used for a given assay, creating a foundation for improvement in this area. Tissue processing for molecular studies usually involves some or all of the following steps: tissue collection, gross dissection/identification, fixation, processing/embedding, storage/archiving, sectioning, staining, microdissection/annotation, and pure analyte labeling/identification and quantification. We provide a detailed comparison of some current tissue microdissection technologies, and provide detailed example protocols for tissue component handling upstream and downstream from microdissection. We also discuss some of the physical and chemical issues related to optimal tissue processing, and include methods specific to cytology specimens. We encourage each laboratory to use these as a starting point for optimization of their overall process of moving from collected tissue to high quality, appropriately anatomically tagged scientific results. In optimized protocols is a source of inefficiency in current life science research. Improvement in this area will significantly increase life science quality and productivity. The article is divided into introduction, materials, protocols, and notes sections. Because many protocols are covered in each of these sections, information relating to a single protocol is not contiguous. To get the greatest benefit from this article, readers are advised to read through the entire article first, identify protocols appropriate to their laboratory for each step in their workflow, and then reread entries in each section pertaining to each of these single protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-152
Number of pages34
JournalApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnology - Part B Molecular Biotechnology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cytology
  • DNA analysis
  • Laser capture microdissection
  • Microdissection
  • Molecular profiling
  • Phenotype-genotype correlation
  • Proteomics
  • RNA analysis
  • Tissue fixation
  • Tissue processing
  • Tissue staining

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Bioengineering
  • Biochemistry
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal molecular profiling of tissue and tissue components: Defining the best processing and microdissection methods for biomedical applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this