OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

Maarten Boers; Dorcas E. Beaton; Beverley J. Shea; Lara J. Maxwell; Susan J. Bartlett; Clifton O. Bingham; Philip G. Conaghan; Maria Antonietta D’Agostino; Maarten P. De Wit; Laure Gossec; Lyn March; Lee S. Simon; Jasvinder A. Singh; Vibeke Strand; George A. Wells; Peter Tugwell

doi:10.3899/jrheum.181096

OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

Maarten Boers
, Dorcas E. Beaton
, Beverley J. Shea
, Lara J. Maxwell
, Susan J. Bartlett
, Clifton O. Bingham
, Philip G. Conaghan
, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino
, Maarten P. De Wit
, Laure Gossec
, Lyn March
, Lee S. Simon
, Jasvinder A. Singh
, Vibeke Strand
, George A. Wells
, Peter Tugwell

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1021-1027
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Rheumatology
Volume	46
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096
State	Published - Aug 1 2019

Keywords

Health status indicator
Measurement model
OMERACT
Patient outcome
Theoretical framework

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Rheumatology
Immunology and Allergy
Immunology

Access to Document

10.3899/jrheum.181096

Cite this

Boers, M., Beaton, D. E., Shea, B. J., Maxwell, L. J., Bartlett, S. J., Bingham, C. O., Conaghan, P. G., D’Agostino, M. A., De Wit, M. P., Gossec, L., March, L., Simon, L. S., Singh, J. A., Strand, V., Wells, G. A., & Tugwell, P. (2019). OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies. Journal of Rheumatology, 46(8), 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096

Boers, M, Beaton, DE, Shea, BJ, Maxwell, LJ, Bartlett, SJ, Bingham, CO, Conaghan, PG, D’Agostino, MA, De Wit, MP, Gossec, L, March, L, Simon, LS, Singh, JA, Strand, V, Wells, GA & Tugwell, P 2019, 'OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096

@article{61d9b18c2ce5482e9658dc294a87c4b0,

title = "OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies",

abstract = "Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.",

keywords = "Health status indicator, Measurement model, OMERACT, Patient outcome, Theoretical framework",

author = "Maarten Boers and Beaton, \{Dorcas E.\} and Shea, \{Beverley J.\} and Maxwell, \{Lara J.\} and Bartlett, \{Susan J.\} and Bingham, \{Clifton O.\} and Conaghan, \{Philip G.\} and D{\textquoteright}Agostino, \{Maria Antonietta\} and \{De Wit\}, \{Maarten P.\} and Laure Gossec and Lyn March and Simon, \{Lee S.\} and Singh, \{Jasvinder A.\} and Vibeke Strand and Wells, \{George A.\} and Peter Tugwell",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3899/jrheum.181096",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "46",

pages = "1021--1027",

journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",

issn = "0315-162X",

publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OMERACT filter 2.1

T2 - Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - Beaton, Dorcas E.

AU - Shea, Beverley J.

AU - Maxwell, Lara J.

AU - Bartlett, Susan J.

AU - Bingham, Clifton O.

AU - Conaghan, Philip G.

AU - D’Agostino, Maria Antonietta

AU - De Wit, Maarten P.

AU - Gossec, Laure

AU - March, Lyn

AU - Simon, Lee S.

AU - Singh, Jasvinder A.

AU - Strand, Vibeke

AU - Wells, George A.

AU - Tugwell, Peter

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

AB - Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

KW - Health status indicator

KW - Measurement model

KW - OMERACT

KW - Patient outcome

KW - Theoretical framework

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85070203338

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85070203338#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.181096

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.181096

M3 - Article

C2 - 30770515

AN - SCOPUS:85070203338

SN - 0315-162X

VL - 46

SP - 1021

EP - 1027

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

IS - 8

ER -

OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this