TY - JOUR
T1 - Objects and places
T2 - Geometric and syntactic representations in early lexical learning
AU - Landau, Barbara
AU - Stecker, Deanna S.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Ray Jackendoff for discussion of the issues raised in this article, to Lila Gleitman, Henry Gleitman, Linda B. Smith and Susan Jones for helpful comments and suggestions on a previous version of the article. We thank the children and teachers of the Columbia University Greenhouse, the Medical Center Nursery School, the Packer Collegiate Institute, and the Princeton Junior School for participating in these studies, and Patricia Williams for able assistance in ah phases of the project. This research was supported by Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Grant #12-214 from the March of Dimes to Barbara Landau. Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to Barbara Landau, Department of Psychology, 315 Schermerhor‘n Hall, Columbia University, New York, New York, 10027.
PY - 1990/7
Y1 - 1990/7
N2 - Three experiments investigated differences in the geometric properties of objects and places underlying children's knowledge of count nouns and prepositions. Three-year-olds, 5-year-olds and adults were shown a novel object being placed in a single location on a box, and were told either "This is a corp" (noun condition) or "This is a corp my box" (preposition condition). They then were asked what new shapes and what new positions were acceptable instances of the novel term. Both children and adults could use the syntactic contexts to make appropriate semantic inferences, assuming that the noun referred to the object itself and the preposition to the object's location. Furthermore, there were striking differences in the geometric properties considered relevant to the two new words. In the noun condition, children and adults attended to the particular shape of the object, extending the new word to objects of the same shape as the standard, regardless of its position. In the preposition condition, they either completely disregarded object shape and accepted a wide variety of positions, or preserved just one component of object shape-the located object's principal linear axis-and accepted positions preserving the object's orientation relative to the box. In both conditions, there was sharpening of attention to shape over age. The results are discussed in terms of distinct geometric representations underlying the two domains of objects and places, and the role these representations play in guiding early word learning.
AB - Three experiments investigated differences in the geometric properties of objects and places underlying children's knowledge of count nouns and prepositions. Three-year-olds, 5-year-olds and adults were shown a novel object being placed in a single location on a box, and were told either "This is a corp" (noun condition) or "This is a corp my box" (preposition condition). They then were asked what new shapes and what new positions were acceptable instances of the novel term. Both children and adults could use the syntactic contexts to make appropriate semantic inferences, assuming that the noun referred to the object itself and the preposition to the object's location. Furthermore, there were striking differences in the geometric properties considered relevant to the two new words. In the noun condition, children and adults attended to the particular shape of the object, extending the new word to objects of the same shape as the standard, regardless of its position. In the preposition condition, they either completely disregarded object shape and accepted a wide variety of positions, or preserved just one component of object shape-the located object's principal linear axis-and accepted positions preserving the object's orientation relative to the box. In both conditions, there was sharpening of attention to shape over age. The results are discussed in terms of distinct geometric representations underlying the two domains of objects and places, and the role these representations play in guiding early word learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45149136206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45149136206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0885-2014(90)90019-P
DO - 10.1016/0885-2014(90)90019-P
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:45149136206
SN - 0885-2014
VL - 5
SP - 287
EP - 312
JO - Cognitive Development
JF - Cognitive Development
IS - 3
ER -