TY - JOUR
T1 - Objective assessment of vaginal surgical skills
AU - Chen, Chi Chiung Grace
AU - Korn, Abner
AU - Klingele, Christopher
AU - Barber, Matthew D.
AU - Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
AU - Walters, Mark D.
AU - Jelovsek, J. Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the Multi-Center Education Research Award, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons .
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to assess surgical skills during vaginal surgery. Study Design: Trainees from 2 institutions were directly assessed in the operating room by supervising surgeons while performing a vaginal hysterectomy using the new Vaginal Surgical Skills Index, global rating scale, and visual analogue scale. Trainees were assessed again by the same surgeons 4 weeks after the live surgery and by a blinded outside reviewer using a videotape of the case. Internal consistency, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity were evaluated. Results: Two hundred twelve evaluations were analyzed on 76 surgeries from 27 trainees. There was good internal consistency, interrater, and intrarater reliability. Vaginal Surgical Skills Index scores correlated with global rating score and visual analog scale scores. Increasing Vaginal Surgical Skills Index scores significantly correlated with year of training and surgical volume with an estimated increase in score of 0.3 per hysterectomy performed. Conclusion: The Vaginal Surgical Skills Index is a feasible, reliable, and valid instrument to assess vaginal surgical skills.
AB - Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to assess surgical skills during vaginal surgery. Study Design: Trainees from 2 institutions were directly assessed in the operating room by supervising surgeons while performing a vaginal hysterectomy using the new Vaginal Surgical Skills Index, global rating scale, and visual analogue scale. Trainees were assessed again by the same surgeons 4 weeks after the live surgery and by a blinded outside reviewer using a videotape of the case. Internal consistency, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity were evaluated. Results: Two hundred twelve evaluations were analyzed on 76 surgeries from 27 trainees. There was good internal consistency, interrater, and intrarater reliability. Vaginal Surgical Skills Index scores correlated with global rating score and visual analog scale scores. Increasing Vaginal Surgical Skills Index scores significantly correlated with year of training and surgical volume with an estimated increase in score of 0.3 per hysterectomy performed. Conclusion: The Vaginal Surgical Skills Index is a feasible, reliable, and valid instrument to assess vaginal surgical skills.
KW - global rating scale
KW - reliability
KW - surgical skills evaluation
KW - vaginal surgery
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953914128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953914128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.072
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.072
M3 - Article
C2 - 20435288
AN - SCOPUS:77953914128
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 203
SP - 79.e1-79.e8
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 1
ER -