TY - JOUR
T1 - Non–risk-adapted Surveillance for Stage I Testicular Cancer
T2 - Critical Review and Summary [Figure presented]
AU - Pierorazio, Phillip Martin
AU - Albers, Peter
AU - Black, Peter C.
AU - Tandstad, Torgrim
AU - Heidenreich, Axel
AU - Nicolai, Nicola
AU - Nichols, Craig
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Association of Urology
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Context: Cancer-specific survival for men with clinical stage I testicular cancer (CSITC) is uniformly excellent. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance (NRAS) is a management strategy for CSITC to minimize overtreatment and avoid possible long-term side effects of adjuvant therapy. Objective: To review the evidence regarding oncologic outcomes for men with CSITC undergoing NRAS and discuss ongoing controversies in the management of CSITC. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1, 1987 through January 1, 2017. Evidence synthesis: A total of 68 studies were included in the critical review. The rationale for NRAS, oncologic outcomes, surveillance protocols, and comparative efficacy of risk-adjusted active surveillance (AS) were reported with strength of evidence and risk of bias evaluated. Cancer-specific survival approaches 100% for men with CSITC undergoing NRAS. Active treatment is limited to 20–30% of patients who will recur; these patients will require salvage chemotherapy and possible retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Existing AS protocols include imaging and laboratory evaluations that are initially intensive but less frequent with increasing follow-up. Conclusions: NRAS is an attractive management option for men with CSITC, which maintains outstanding long-term cancer cure while sparing most patients treatment by avoiding prophylactic chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Patient summary: Men with clinically localized (stage I) testicular cancer have an excellent prognosis, regardless of management. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance is an attractive management option where only patients destined to relapse will receive any treatment following orchiectomy. However, individual patient preferences should be discussed in selecting a management strategy. Men with clinically localized, stage I testicular cancer have an excellent prognosis, regardless of management. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance is an attractive management option for men with clinical stage I testicular cancer, which offers outstanding long-term cancer cure while sparing most patients treatment by avoiding prophylactic chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Individual patient preferences and consideration of long-term toxicities should be discussed in selecting a management strategy.
AB - Context: Cancer-specific survival for men with clinical stage I testicular cancer (CSITC) is uniformly excellent. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance (NRAS) is a management strategy for CSITC to minimize overtreatment and avoid possible long-term side effects of adjuvant therapy. Objective: To review the evidence regarding oncologic outcomes for men with CSITC undergoing NRAS and discuss ongoing controversies in the management of CSITC. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1, 1987 through January 1, 2017. Evidence synthesis: A total of 68 studies were included in the critical review. The rationale for NRAS, oncologic outcomes, surveillance protocols, and comparative efficacy of risk-adjusted active surveillance (AS) were reported with strength of evidence and risk of bias evaluated. Cancer-specific survival approaches 100% for men with CSITC undergoing NRAS. Active treatment is limited to 20–30% of patients who will recur; these patients will require salvage chemotherapy and possible retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Existing AS protocols include imaging and laboratory evaluations that are initially intensive but less frequent with increasing follow-up. Conclusions: NRAS is an attractive management option for men with CSITC, which maintains outstanding long-term cancer cure while sparing most patients treatment by avoiding prophylactic chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Patient summary: Men with clinically localized (stage I) testicular cancer have an excellent prognosis, regardless of management. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance is an attractive management option where only patients destined to relapse will receive any treatment following orchiectomy. However, individual patient preferences should be discussed in selecting a management strategy. Men with clinically localized, stage I testicular cancer have an excellent prognosis, regardless of management. Non–risk-adapted active surveillance is an attractive management option for men with clinical stage I testicular cancer, which offers outstanding long-term cancer cure while sparing most patients treatment by avoiding prophylactic chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Individual patient preferences and consideration of long-term toxicities should be discussed in selecting a management strategy.
KW - Active surveillance
KW - Germ cell tumor
KW - Testicular cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040455257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040455257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.030
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.030
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29338978
AN - SCOPUS:85040455257
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 73
SP - 899
EP - 907
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 6
ER -