TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence
T2 - review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop
AU - Norton, Jenna M.
AU - Dodson, Jennifer L.
AU - Newman, Diane K.
AU - Rogers, Rebecca G.
AU - Fairman, Andrea D.
AU - Coons, Helen L.
AU - Star, Robert A.
AU - Bavendam, Tamara G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the participants of the NIDDK Workshop on Behavioral and Psychosocial Factors in Women with UI: ? Tamara Bavendam, MD ? Kathryn Burgio, PhD ? Helen L. Coons, PhD, ABPP ? Jennifer Dodson, MD, PhD ? Andrea Fairman, PhD, OTR/L, CPRP ? Judy Fried-Siegel, MD ? Ziya Kirkali, MD ? John Kusek, MD ? Marva Moxey-Mims, MD ? Diane K. Newman, DNP, ANP-BC, FAAN ? Jenna Norton, MPH ? Neil Resnick, MD ? Leslie Rickey, MD, MPH ? Rebecca Rogers, MD ? Silvia S?rensen, PhD ? Robert A. Star, MD ? Marian Tanofsky-Kraff, PhD ? Kevin Weinfurt, PhD ? Gail Wyatt, PhD ? Andrew Zabel, PhD, ABPP
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The International Urogynecological Association.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary incontinence (UI)—defined as a complaint of involuntary loss of urine—is common in women, with major public health, financial, and quality of life (QoL) implications. Despite the high toll of UI and the availability of effective conservative treatments, many women with UI do not seek care. Those who do often continue to experience symptoms. Improving UI treatment may require a comprehensive approach to urology research, including a broad set of potentially influential factors beyond biologic. Methods: To explore the effects of nonbiologic factors (NBF) on UI management and treatment response, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop for clinical and psychosocial researchers. Participants proposed a UI treatment pathway: recognizing the problem, willingness to seek treatment, access to care, receiving quality treatment, engaging in self-management, and adhering to chosen treatments; discussed potential NBFs that may affect the pathway; and identified areas for future research. After the meeting, a rapid literature review was conducted to assess the current state of research on NBFs in women with UI. Results: Participants identified several patient-level NBFs that may influence the UI management pathway, including QoL and perceived bother; stigma, shame, and embarrassment; knowledge and perceptions; social determinants of health; cultural and language characteristics; personal characteristics and skills; and physical abilities. Additionally, participants acknowledged that provider- and system-level factors also play a role and likely interact with patient-level factors. Conclusions: NBFs that potentially affect the UI management pathway are not well understood, and a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach to research is needed to understand and appropriately support effective UI treatment.
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: Urinary incontinence (UI)—defined as a complaint of involuntary loss of urine—is common in women, with major public health, financial, and quality of life (QoL) implications. Despite the high toll of UI and the availability of effective conservative treatments, many women with UI do not seek care. Those who do often continue to experience symptoms. Improving UI treatment may require a comprehensive approach to urology research, including a broad set of potentially influential factors beyond biologic. Methods: To explore the effects of nonbiologic factors (NBF) on UI management and treatment response, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop for clinical and psychosocial researchers. Participants proposed a UI treatment pathway: recognizing the problem, willingness to seek treatment, access to care, receiving quality treatment, engaging in self-management, and adhering to chosen treatments; discussed potential NBFs that may affect the pathway; and identified areas for future research. After the meeting, a rapid literature review was conducted to assess the current state of research on NBFs in women with UI. Results: Participants identified several patient-level NBFs that may influence the UI management pathway, including QoL and perceived bother; stigma, shame, and embarrassment; knowledge and perceptions; social determinants of health; cultural and language characteristics; personal characteristics and skills; and physical abilities. Additionally, participants acknowledged that provider- and system-level factors also play a role and likely interact with patient-level factors. Conclusions: NBFs that potentially affect the UI management pathway are not well understood, and a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach to research is needed to understand and appropriately support effective UI treatment.
KW - Access to care
KW - Adherence
KW - Quality care
KW - Self-management
KW - Treatment seeking
KW - Urinary incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021823953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021823953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-017-3400-x
DO - 10.1007/s00192-017-3400-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 28674734
AN - SCOPUS:85021823953
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 28
SP - 1295
EP - 1307
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
IS - 9
ER -