Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Radiation Complications and Oncologic Safety

Caroline A. King, Alex J. Bartholomew, Stefan Dabic, Olutayo Sogunro, Idanis M. Perez-Alvarez, Alexandra F. Welschmeyer, Michael Sosin, Renee M. Thibodeau, Kenneth L. Fan, David H. Song, Ian T. Greenwalt, Eleni A. Tousimis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers improved, patientcentered outcomes with demonstrated oncologic safety (Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:344-351). Indications for NSM continue to expand to patients outside of the traditional eligibility criteria, including those with prior breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy. Currently, limited data exist evaluating both short- and long-term outcomes in patients proceeding to NSM after prior BCT. Methods: All patients undergoing bilateral NSM in a single institution from 2002 through 2017 with history of prior BCTwere included in the final cohort, without exclusions. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, operative details, and complications. Outcomes assessed included early complications (<30 days from NSM), late complications (>30 days), rates of prosthetic failure, unplanned reoperations, and reconstructive failures, as well as oncologic safety. Student t, χ2, and Fisher exact testswere used to analyze outcomes of paired (BCT vs non-BCT) breasts within each patient. Results: A total of 17 patients undergoing 34 NSMs were included. Each had a history of BCT and either ipsilateral breast recurrence (64.7%), risk-reducing NSM (23.5%), or a new contralateral primary cancer (11.8%). The cohort had a mean age of 51.1 years. With regard to acute complications (ischemia, infection, nipple-areolar complex or flap ischemia or necrosis, and wound dehiscence), there was no significant difference noted between breastswith prior BCT versus no prior BCT overall (41.2% vs 35.3%, respectively; P = 0.724). Complications occurring after 30 days postoperatively (capsular contracture, contour abnormality, animation deformity, bottoming out, rotation, and rippling) in prior BCT breasts versus no prior BCT had no significant differences overall (58.8%vs 41.2% respectively; P = 0.303). The mean follow-up was 5.5 years, during which no patients had a reported locoregional or distant recurrence in either breast. Conclusions: No significant differences in early or late complications were identified between breasts in patients undergoing bilateralNSMwith a history of unilateral BCT and XRT. In the 5.5 years of follow-up, there were no recurrences, lending support to NSM for management of recurrent disease in addition to National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended total mastectomy.We propose that NSM should not be contraindicated in patients exposed to radiation with BCT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)709-714
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of plastic surgery
Volume91
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • breast-conserving therapy
  • lumpectomy
  • nipple-sparing mastectomy
  • oncologic safety
  • radiation therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Radiation Complications and Oncologic Safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this