TY - JOUR
T1 - New portable tool to screen vestibular and visual function-National institutes of health toolbox initiative
AU - Rine, Rose Marie
AU - Roberts, Dale
AU - Corbin, Bree A.
AU - Mckean-Cowdin, Roberta
AU - Varma, Rohit
AU - Beaumont, Jennifer
AU - Slotkin, Jerry
AU - Schubert, Michael C.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - As part of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox initiative, we developed a low-cost, easy-to-administer, and time-efficient test of vestibular and visual function. A computerized test of dynamic visual acuity (cDVA) was used to measure the difference in visual acuity between head still and moving in yaw. Participants included 318 individuals, aged 3 to 85 years (301 without and 17 with vestibular pathology). Adults used Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) optotypes; children used ETDRS, Lea, and HOTV optotypes. Bithermal calorics, rotational chair, and light box testing were used to validate the cDVA. Analysis revealed that the cDVA test is reliable for static (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >/ 0.64) and dynamic (ICC >/ 0.43-0.75) visual acuity. Children younger than 6 years old were more likely to complete cDVA with Lea optotypes, but reliability and correlation with ETDRS was better using HOTV optotypes. The high correlation between static acuity and light box test scores (r = 0.795), significant difference of cDVA scores between those with and without pathology (p </ 0.04), and the good to excellent sensitivity (73%) and specificity (69%) establish that the cDVA is a valid and reliable measure of visual acuity when the head is still and moving, as well as a good proxy of vestibular function to yaw rotation.
AB - As part of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox initiative, we developed a low-cost, easy-to-administer, and time-efficient test of vestibular and visual function. A computerized test of dynamic visual acuity (cDVA) was used to measure the difference in visual acuity between head still and moving in yaw. Participants included 318 individuals, aged 3 to 85 years (301 without and 17 with vestibular pathology). Adults used Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) optotypes; children used ETDRS, Lea, and HOTV optotypes. Bithermal calorics, rotational chair, and light box testing were used to validate the cDVA. Analysis revealed that the cDVA test is reliable for static (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >/ 0.64) and dynamic (ICC >/ 0.43-0.75) visual acuity. Children younger than 6 years old were more likely to complete cDVA with Lea optotypes, but reliability and correlation with ETDRS was better using HOTV optotypes. The high correlation between static acuity and light box test scores (r = 0.795), significant difference of cDVA scores between those with and without pathology (p </ 0.04), and the good to excellent sensitivity (73%) and specificity (69%) establish that the cDVA is a valid and reliable measure of visual acuity when the head is still and moving, as well as a good proxy of vestibular function to yaw rotation.
KW - Dynamic visual acuity
KW - Gaze stability
KW - Nih tool-box
KW - Optotype
KW - Static visual acuity
KW - Vestibular
KW - Vestibular reha-bilitation
KW - Vestibular test
KW - Vision
KW - Vision test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930476574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930476574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1682/JRRD.2010.12.0239
DO - 10.1682/JRRD.2010.12.0239
M3 - Article
C2 - 22773523
AN - SCOPUS:84930476574
SN - 0748-7711
VL - 49
SP - 209
EP - 220
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
IS - 2
ER -