TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in mechanically ventilated patients
T2 - A randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial with blinded outcome assessment
AU - Kho, Michelle E.
AU - Truong, Alexander D.
AU - Zanni, Jennifer M.
AU - Ciesla, Nancy D.
AU - Brower, Roy G.
AU - Palmer, Jeffrey B.
AU - Needham, Dale M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) vs sham on leg strength at hospital discharge in mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study of NMES vs sham applied to 3 bilateral lower extremity muscle groups for 60 minutes daily in the intensive care unit (ICU). Between June 2008 and March 2013, we enrolled adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation within the first week of ICU stay and who could transfer independently from bed to chair before hospital admission. The primary outcome was lower extremity muscle strength at hospital discharge using Medical Research Council score (maximum, 30). Secondary outcomes at hospital discharge included walking distance and change in lower extremity strength from ICU awakening. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00709124. Results: We stopped enrollment early after 36 patients due to slow patient accrual and the end of research funding. For NMES vs sham, mean (SD) lower extremity strength was 28 (2) vs 27 (3), P = .072. Among secondary outcomes, NMES vs sham patients had a greater mean (SD) walking distance (514 [389] vs 251 [210] ft, P = .050) and increase in muscle strength (5.7 [5.1] vs 1.8 [2.7], P = .019). Conclusions: In this pilot randomized trial, NMES did not significantly improve leg strength at hospital discharge. Significant improvements in secondary outcomes require investigation in future research.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) vs sham on leg strength at hospital discharge in mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a randomized pilot study of NMES vs sham applied to 3 bilateral lower extremity muscle groups for 60 minutes daily in the intensive care unit (ICU). Between June 2008 and March 2013, we enrolled adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation within the first week of ICU stay and who could transfer independently from bed to chair before hospital admission. The primary outcome was lower extremity muscle strength at hospital discharge using Medical Research Council score (maximum, 30). Secondary outcomes at hospital discharge included walking distance and change in lower extremity strength from ICU awakening. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00709124. Results: We stopped enrollment early after 36 patients due to slow patient accrual and the end of research funding. For NMES vs sham, mean (SD) lower extremity strength was 28 (2) vs 27 (3), P = .072. Among secondary outcomes, NMES vs sham patients had a greater mean (SD) walking distance (514 [389] vs 251 [210] ft, P = .050) and increase in muscle strength (5.7 [5.1] vs 1.8 [2.7], P = .019). Conclusions: In this pilot randomized trial, NMES did not significantly improve leg strength at hospital discharge. Significant improvements in secondary outcomes require investigation in future research.
KW - Critical illness
KW - Electric stimulation
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Muscle
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Respiration artificial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920616928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920616928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 25307979
AN - SCOPUS:84920616928
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 30
SP - 32
EP - 39
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
IS - 1
ER -