Neural correlates of deception: Lying about past events and personal beliefs

Noa Ofen, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Xiaoqian J. Chai, Rebecca F. Schwarzlose, John D.E. Gabrieli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although a growing body of literature suggests that cognitive control processes are involved in deception, much about the neural correlates of lying remains unknown. In this study, we tested whether brain activation associated with deception, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), can be detected either in preparation for or during the execution of a lie, and whether they depend on the content of the lie. We scanned participants while they lied or told the truth about either their personal experiences (episodic memories) or personal beliefs. Regions in the frontal and parietal cortex showed higher activation when participants lied compared with when they were telling the truth, regardless of whether they were asked about their past experiences or opinions. In contrast, lie-related activation in the right temporal pole, precuneus and the right amygdala differed by the content of the lie. Preparing to lie activated parietal and frontal brain regions that were distinct from those activated while participants executed lies. Our findings concur with previous reports on the involvement of frontal and parietal regions in deception, but specify brain regions involved in the preparation vs execution of deception, and those involved in deceiving about experiences vs opinions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-127
Number of pages12
JournalSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Beliefs
  • Deception
  • Episodic memory
  • FMRI
  • Lie

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neural correlates of deception: Lying about past events and personal beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this