Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit

Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and ‘best practices’. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery. Methods Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national cancer registry were evaluated. Morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed of all pancreatic resections registered during the first two audit years. Case ascertainment was cross-checked with the Dutch healthcare inspectorate and key-variables validated in all centers. Results Sixteen RCT's and three large series were found. Sixteen indicators and 20 case-mix factors were included in the audit. During 2014–2015, 1785 pancreatic resections were registered including 1345 pancreatoduodenectomies. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, mortality was 4.1%, Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III morbidity was 29.9%, median (IQR) length of stay 12 (9–18) days, and readmission rate 16.0%. In total 97.2% of >40,000 variables validated were consistent with the medical charts. Conclusions The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, with high quality data, reports good outcomes of pancreatic surgery on a national level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-926
Number of pages8
JournalHPB
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this