TY - JOUR
T1 - Multimodal Phenomap of Stargardt Disease Integrating Structural, Psychophysical, and Electrophysiologic Measures of Retinal Degeneration
AU - Abousy, Mya
AU - Antonio-Aguirre, Bani
AU - Aziz, Kanza
AU - Hu, Ming Wen
AU - Qian, Jiang
AU - Singh, Mandeep S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Objective: To cluster the diverse phenotypic features of Stargardt disease (STGD) using unsupervised clustering of multimodal retinal structure and function data. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects: Eyes of subjects with STGD and fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, electroretinography (ERG), and microperimetry (MP) data available within 1 year of the baseline evaluation. Methods: A total of 46 variables from FAF, OCT, ERG, and MP results were recorded for subjects with STGD as defined per published criteria. Factor analysis of mixed data identified the most informative variables. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and silhouette analysis identified the optimal number of clusters to classify multimodal phenotypes. Main Outcome Measures: Phenotypic clusters of STGD subjects and the corresponding cluster features. Results: We included 52 subjects and 102 eyes with a mean visual acuity (VA) at the time of multimodal testing of 0.69 ± 0.494 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (20/63 Snellen). We identified 4 clusters of eyes. Compared to the other clusters, cluster 1 (n = 16) included younger subjects, VA greater than that of clusters 2 and 3, normal or moderately low total macular volume (TMV), greater preservation of scotopic and photopic ERG responses and fixation stability, less atrophy, and fewer flecks. Cluster 2 (n = 49) differed from cluster 1 mainly with less atrophy and relatively stable fixation. Cluster 3 (n = 10) included older subjects than clusters 1 and 2 and showed the lowest VA, TMV, ERG responses, and fixation stability, with extensive atrophy. Cluster 4 (n = 27) showed better VA, TMV similar to clusters 1 and 2, moderate ERG activity, stable fixation, and moderate-high atrophy and flecks. Conclusions: Reflecting the phenotypic complexity of STGD, an unsupervised clustering approach incorporating phenotypic measures can be used to categorize STGD eyes into distinct clusters. The clusters exhibit differences in structural and functional measures including quantity of flecks, extent of retinal atrophy, visual fixation accuracy, and ERG responses, among other features. If novel pharmacologic, gene, or cell therapy modalities become available in the future, the multimodal phenomap approach may be useful to individualize treatment decisions, and its utility in aiding prognostication requires further evaluation. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
AB - Objective: To cluster the diverse phenotypic features of Stargardt disease (STGD) using unsupervised clustering of multimodal retinal structure and function data. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects: Eyes of subjects with STGD and fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCT, electroretinography (ERG), and microperimetry (MP) data available within 1 year of the baseline evaluation. Methods: A total of 46 variables from FAF, OCT, ERG, and MP results were recorded for subjects with STGD as defined per published criteria. Factor analysis of mixed data identified the most informative variables. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and silhouette analysis identified the optimal number of clusters to classify multimodal phenotypes. Main Outcome Measures: Phenotypic clusters of STGD subjects and the corresponding cluster features. Results: We included 52 subjects and 102 eyes with a mean visual acuity (VA) at the time of multimodal testing of 0.69 ± 0.494 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (20/63 Snellen). We identified 4 clusters of eyes. Compared to the other clusters, cluster 1 (n = 16) included younger subjects, VA greater than that of clusters 2 and 3, normal or moderately low total macular volume (TMV), greater preservation of scotopic and photopic ERG responses and fixation stability, less atrophy, and fewer flecks. Cluster 2 (n = 49) differed from cluster 1 mainly with less atrophy and relatively stable fixation. Cluster 3 (n = 10) included older subjects than clusters 1 and 2 and showed the lowest VA, TMV, ERG responses, and fixation stability, with extensive atrophy. Cluster 4 (n = 27) showed better VA, TMV similar to clusters 1 and 2, moderate ERG activity, stable fixation, and moderate-high atrophy and flecks. Conclusions: Reflecting the phenotypic complexity of STGD, an unsupervised clustering approach incorporating phenotypic measures can be used to categorize STGD eyes into distinct clusters. The clusters exhibit differences in structural and functional measures including quantity of flecks, extent of retinal atrophy, visual fixation accuracy, and ERG responses, among other features. If novel pharmacologic, gene, or cell therapy modalities become available in the future, the multimodal phenomap approach may be useful to individualize treatment decisions, and its utility in aiding prognostication requires further evaluation. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
KW - ABCA4
KW - Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
KW - Inherited retinal disease
KW - Juvenile macular dystrophy
KW - Optical coherence tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173843960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173843960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100327
DO - 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100327
M3 - Article
C2 - 37869022
AN - SCOPUS:85173843960
SN - 2666-9145
VL - 4
JO - Ophthalmology Science
JF - Ophthalmology Science
IS - 1
M1 - 100327
ER -