Multicenter study of racial and ethnic inequities in liver transplantation evaluation: Understanding mechanisms and identifying solutions

Alexandra T. Strauss, Carolyn N. Sidoti, Tanjala S. Purnell, Hannah C. Sung, John W. Jackson, Scott Levin, Vedant S. Jain, Daniel Malinsky, Dorry L. Segev, James P. Hamilton, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang, Stephen H. Gray, Macey L. Levan, Joseph R. Scalea, Andrew M. Cameron, Ahmet Gurakar, Ayse P. Gurses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Racial and ethnic disparities persist in access to the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list; however, there is limited knowledge about underlying system-level factors that may be responsible for these disparities. Given the complex nature of LT candidate evaluation, a human factors and systems engineering approach may provide insights. We recruited participants from the LT teams (coordinators, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers, dieticians, pharmacists, leadership) at two major LT centers. From December 2020 to July 2021, we performed ethnographic observations (participant–patient appointments, committee meetings) and semistructured interviews (N = 54 interviews, 49 observation hours). Based on findings from this multicenter, multimethod qualitative study combined with the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 (a human factors and systems engineering model for health care), we created a conceptual framework describing how transplant work system characteristics and other external factors may improve equity in the LT evaluation process. Participant perceptions about listing disparities described external factors (e.g., structural racism, ambiguous national guidelines, national quality metrics) that permeate the LT evaluation process. Mechanisms identified included minimal transplant team diversity, implicit bias, and interpersonal racism. A lack of resources was a common theme, such as social workers, transportation assistance, non–English-language materials, and time (e.g., more time for education for patients with health literacy concerns). Because of the minimal data collection or center feedback about disparities, participants felt uncomfortable with and unadaptable to unwanted outcomes, which perpetuate disparities. We proposed transplant center–level solutions (i.e., including but not limited to training of staff on health equity) to modifiable barriers in the clinical work system that could help patient navigation, reduce disparities, and improve access to care. Our findings call for an urgent need for transplant centers, national societies, and policy makers to focus efforts on improving equity (tailored, patient-centered resources) using the science of human factors and systems engineering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1841-1856
Number of pages16
JournalLiver Transplantation
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Surgery
  • Hepatology


Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter study of racial and ethnic inequities in liver transplantation evaluation: Understanding mechanisms and identifying solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this