Mucosal Vaccines, Sterilizing Immunity, and the Future of SARS-CoV-2 Virulence

Daniele Focosi, Fabrizio Maggi, Arturo Casadevall

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Sterilizing immunity after vaccination is desirable to prevent the spread of infection from vaccinees, which can be especially dangerous in hospital settings while managing frail patients. Sterilizing immunity requires neutralizing antibodies at the site of infection, which for respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 implies the occurrence of neutralizing IgA in mucosal secretions. Systemic vaccination by intramuscular delivery induces no or low-titer neutralizing IgA against vaccine antigens. Mucosal priming or boosting, is needed to provide sterilizing immunity. On the other side of the coin, sterilizing immunity, by zeroing interhuman transmission, could confine SARS-CoV-2 in animal reservoirs, preventing spontaneous attenuation of virulence in humans as presumably happened with the endemic coronaviruses. We review here the pros and cons of each vaccination strategy, the current mucosal SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under development, and their implications for public health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number187
JournalViruses
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Keywords

  • BNT162b2
  • COVID-19
  • IgA
  • IgG
  • Intranasal vaccine
  • MRNA-1273
  • Mucosal vaccines
  • Neutralizing antibody
  • Oral vaccines
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Sterilizing immunity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Virology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mucosal Vaccines, Sterilizing Immunity, and the Future of SARS-CoV-2 Virulence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this