Mortality of captive whooping cranes caused by eastern equine encephalitis virus.

F. J. Dein, J. W. Carpenter, G. G. Clark, R. J. Montali, C. L. Crabbs, T. F. Tsai, D. E. Docherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Of 39 captive whooping cranes (Grus americana), 7 died during a 7-week period (Sept 17 through Nov 4, 1984) at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Md. Before their deaths, 4 cranes did not develop clinical signs, whereas the other 3 cranes were lethargic and ataxic, with high aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and lactic acid dehydrogenase activities, and high uric acid concentrations. Necropsies indicated that the birds had ascites, intestinal mucosal discoloration, fat depletion, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and visceral gout. Microscopically, extensive necrosis and inflammation were seen in many visceral organs; the CNS was not affected. Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) virus was isolated from specimens of the livers, kidneys, lungs, brains, and intestines of 4 of the 7 birds that died, and EEE virus-neutralizing antibody was detected in 14 (44%) of the 32 surviving birds. Other infectious or toxic agents were not found. Morbidity or mortality was not detected in 240 sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) interspersed among the whooping cranes; however, 13 of the 32 sandhill cranes evaluated had EEE virus-neutralizing antibody. Of the 41 wild birds evaluated in the area, 3 (4%) had EEE virus-neutralizing antibody. Immature Culiseta melanura (the most probable mosquito vector) were found in scattered foci 5 km from the research center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1006-1010
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume189
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Veterinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mortality of captive whooping cranes caused by eastern equine encephalitis virus.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this