TY - JOUR
T1 - Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series – Paper 3
T2 - patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management
AU - Noonan, Vanessa K.
AU - Lyddiatt, Anne
AU - Ware, Patrick
AU - Jaglal, Susan B.
AU - Riopelle, Richard J.
AU - Bingham, Clifton O.
AU - Figueiredo, Sabrina
AU - Sawatzky, Richard
AU - Santana, Maria
AU - Bartlett, Susan J.
AU - Ahmed, Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Background There is a shift toward making health care patient centered, whereby patients are part of medical decision-making and take responsibility for managing their health. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the patient voice and can be used to engage patients in medical decision-making. Objective The objective of this paper is to present important factors from patients’ clinicians’ researchers’ and decision-makers’ perspectives that influence successful adoption of PROs in clinical practice. Factors recommended in this paper were informed by a patient partner. Discussion Based on themes arising from the Montreal Accord proceedings, we describe factors that influence the adoption of PROs and how PROs can have a positive effect by enhancing communication and providing opportunities to engage patients, carers, and clinicians in care. Consideration of patient factors (e.g., health literacy), family support and networks (e.g., peer-support networks), technology (e.g., e-health), and health care system factors (e.g., resources to implement PROs) is necessary to ensure PROs are successfully adopted. PRO evaluation plans most likely to succeed over the long term are those incorporating PROs identified by patients as necessary for self-management and that coincide with providers’ needs for collaboratively developing treatment plans with patients and families.
AB - Background There is a shift toward making health care patient centered, whereby patients are part of medical decision-making and take responsibility for managing their health. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the patient voice and can be used to engage patients in medical decision-making. Objective The objective of this paper is to present important factors from patients’ clinicians’ researchers’ and decision-makers’ perspectives that influence successful adoption of PROs in clinical practice. Factors recommended in this paper were informed by a patient partner. Discussion Based on themes arising from the Montreal Accord proceedings, we describe factors that influence the adoption of PROs and how PROs can have a positive effect by enhancing communication and providing opportunities to engage patients, carers, and clinicians in care. Consideration of patient factors (e.g., health literacy), family support and networks (e.g., peer-support networks), technology (e.g., e-health), and health care system factors (e.g., resources to implement PROs) is necessary to ensure PROs are successfully adopted. PRO evaluation plans most likely to succeed over the long term are those incorporating PROs identified by patients as necessary for self-management and that coincide with providers’ needs for collaboratively developing treatment plans with patients and families.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Patient-centered care
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Self-management
KW - Self-report
KW - Shared decision-making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023743956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023743956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28433671
AN - SCOPUS:85023743956
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 89
SP - 125
EP - 135
JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases
JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases
ER -