Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

MitoSafe hypothesis: safeguarding mitochondrial morphology and innate immunity

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Mitochondria divide and fuse, and the balance between these processes maintains mitochondrial morphology and function. Although the core fusion and division machinery is well established, how cells sense mitochondrial morphology and actively adjust it remains unclear. In this Opinion article, we propose a new conceptual framework, termed ‘Mitochondrial Safeguard (MitoSafe)’, in which cells monitor mitochondrial size and rebalance division and fusion through four branches: activation of fusion or inhibition of division in small mitochondria and activation of division or inhibition of fusion in enlarged mitochondria. Recent findings show that fusion is suppressed once mitochondria exceed a healthy size threshold. Dysregulation of this branch of MitoSafe, involving Parkin, PINK1, SLC25A3, SOD1, and cytochrome-c oxidase, causes mitochondrial enlargement, mitochondrial DNA release, and stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-mediated inflammation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-744
Number of pages9
JournalTrends in Cell Biology
Volume36
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2026

Keywords

  • OMA1
  • PINK1
  • Parkin
  • dynamin-related GTPase
  • inflammation
  • mitochondria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MitoSafe hypothesis: safeguarding mitochondrial morphology and innate immunity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this