Abstract
Objective: To compare the results of a minimal-stimulation protocol with those of a standard protocol used for IVF. Design: Retrospective, controlled study. Setting: University center. Patient(s): Fifty-five patients undergoing IVF using a minimal-stimulation protocol with or without adjuvant therapy with a GnRH antagonist. A control group consisted of age- and diagnosis-matched patients undergoing a standard long GnRH agonist (GnRH-a)-gonadotropin stimulation during the same time period. Intervention(s): Clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins, with or without the GnRH antagonist ganirelix. Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocytes recovered and pregnancy rates. Result(s): The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly lower for the minimal-stimulation regimen compared with the case of the long GnRH-a protocol (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 16.2 ± 7.5, respectively). The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, however, was not significantly different between the two regimens (37% vs. 41%, minimal stimulation vs. long GnRH-a protocol, respectively). The addition of ganirelix resulted in at least the same pregnancy outcome as compared with the case of cycles without the antagonist. Conclusion(s): Minimal stimulation using clomiphene citrate followed by gonadotropin for IVF results in pregnancy rates equal to the standard long GnRH-a-gonadotropin protocol. The addition of ganirelix resulted in at least similar results with the advantage of eliminating the occurrence of a premature endogenous LH surge.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1068-1072 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Fertility and sterility |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- GnRH antagonist
- IVF
- Minimal stimulation
- Pregnancy rate
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology