TY - JOUR
T1 - Methylation biomarker panel performance in esophacap cytology samples for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus
T2 - A prospective validation study
AU - Wang, Zhixiong
AU - Kambhampati, Swetha
AU - Cheng, Yulan
AU - Ma, Ke
AU - Simsek, Cem
AU - Tieu, Alan H.
AU - Abraham, John M.
AU - Liu, Xi
AU - Prasath, Vishnu
AU - Duncan, Mark
AU - Stark, Alejandro
AU - Trick, Alexander
AU - Tsai, Hua Ling
AU - Wang, Hao
AU - He, Yulong
AU - Khashab, Mouen A.
AU - Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
AU - Shin, Eun J.
AU - Wang, Tza Huei
AU - Meltzer, Stephen J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the generous support of Drs. Alan, Rosaline Barron, and Sariat Ibrahim. This work was supported by the NIH (grants CA211457 and DK118250), the Emerson Cancer Research Fund, and a Discovery Award from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. S.J. Meltzer is the Harry and Betty Myerberg-Thomas R. Hendrix Professor and an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor. Z. Wang was supported by a Scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the 3 3 Fund from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the NIH (grants CA211457 and DK118250), the Emerson Cancer Research Fund, and a Discovery Award from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. S.J. Meltzer is the Harry and Betty Myerberg-Thomas R. Hendrix Professor and an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor. Z. Wang was supported by a Scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) and the 3 ⨯ 3 Fund from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Purpose: Barrett's esophagus is the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although endoscopy and biopsy are standard methods for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis, their high cost and risk limit their use as a screening modality. Here, we sought to develop a Barrett's esophagus detection method based on methylation status in cytology samples captured by EsophaCap using a streamlined sensitive technique, methylation on beads (MOB). Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 80 patients (52 in the training set; 28 in the test set). We used MOB to extract and bisulfite-convert DNA, followed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR to assess methylation levels of 8 previously selected candidate markers. Lasso regression was applied to establish a prediction model in the training set, which was then tested on the independent test set. Results: In the training set, five of eight candidate methylation biomarkers (p16, HPP1, NELL1, TAC1, and AKAP12) were significantly higher in Barrett's esophagus patients than in controls. We built a four-biomarker-plus-age lasso regression model for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. The AUC was 0.894, with sensitivity 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71%–99%] and specificity 62.2% (95% CI, 44.6%–77.3%) in the training set. This model also performed with high accuracy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis in an independent test set: AUC ¼ 0.929 (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.810%–1%), with sensitivity¼78.6% (95% CI, 48.8%–94.3%) and specificity ¼ 92.8% (95% CI, 64.1%–99.6%). Conclusions: EsophaCap, in combination with an epigenetic biomarker panel and the MOB method, is a promising, well-tolerated, low-cost esophageal sampling strategy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. This approach merits further prospective studies in larger populations.
AB - Purpose: Barrett's esophagus is the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although endoscopy and biopsy are standard methods for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis, their high cost and risk limit their use as a screening modality. Here, we sought to develop a Barrett's esophagus detection method based on methylation status in cytology samples captured by EsophaCap using a streamlined sensitive technique, methylation on beads (MOB). Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 80 patients (52 in the training set; 28 in the test set). We used MOB to extract and bisulfite-convert DNA, followed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR to assess methylation levels of 8 previously selected candidate markers. Lasso regression was applied to establish a prediction model in the training set, which was then tested on the independent test set. Results: In the training set, five of eight candidate methylation biomarkers (p16, HPP1, NELL1, TAC1, and AKAP12) were significantly higher in Barrett's esophagus patients than in controls. We built a four-biomarker-plus-age lasso regression model for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. The AUC was 0.894, with sensitivity 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71%–99%] and specificity 62.2% (95% CI, 44.6%–77.3%) in the training set. This model also performed with high accuracy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis in an independent test set: AUC ¼ 0.929 (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.810%–1%), with sensitivity¼78.6% (95% CI, 48.8%–94.3%) and specificity ¼ 92.8% (95% CI, 64.1%–99.6%). Conclusions: EsophaCap, in combination with an epigenetic biomarker panel and the MOB method, is a promising, well-tolerated, low-cost esophageal sampling strategy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. This approach merits further prospective studies in larger populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064160995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064160995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3696
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3696
M3 - Article
C2 - 30670490
AN - SCOPUS:85064160995
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 25
SP - 2127
EP - 2135
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 7
ER -