TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodology and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial testing a health care professional and peer-support program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
T2 - The BREATHE2 study
AU - Aboumatar, Hanan
AU - Naqibuddin, Mohammad
AU - Neiman, Joseph
AU - Saunders, Jamia
AU - Kim, Samuel
AU - Chaudhry, Hina
AU - Garcia-Morales, Emmanuel
AU - Robinson, Nancy
AU - McBurney, Marjorie
AU - Jager, Leah
AU - Ajayi, Tokunbo
AU - Bone, Lee
AU - Chung, Suna
AU - Farrell, Bernard
AU - Joo Jin, Hui
AU - Linnell, John
AU - Pirfo, Marlene
AU - Rand, Cynthia
AU - Riley, Peggy
AU - Salvaterra, Carmen
AU - Shea, Kai
AU - Singh, Jorawar
AU - Wise, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Background: Self-management support (SMS) for patients with COPD can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, it remains unclear what SMS strategies are most effective. Using peer support to advance self-management is promising, as peer supporters possess credibility and can serve as role models. Methods: We conducted a single-blinded RCT comparing the effectiveness of two strategies to support patients with COPD. The strategies were ‘Health Care Professional (HCP)’ and ‘HCP Plus Peer’ support. Peer support was provided by patients with COPD who have stopped smoking, completed an acute pulmonary rehabilitation program, and met the requirements for becoming a peer supporter. We enrolled patients receiving treatment at inpatient and outpatient settings. Patients were encouraged to invite one family-caregiver to enroll with them. The primary outcome measure was the change in HRQOL at 6 months post enrollment. Secondary outcomes included COPD-related and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Caregiver outcomes included preparedness for caregiving, caregiver stress, and coping. Results: A total of 292 patients as well as 50 family-caregivers were enrolled. The average patient age was 67.3 yrs. (SD 9.4), 61% were female and 26% were African-Americans. The majority of caregivers were females (68%) and were a spouse/partner (58%). Discussion: This study tested a dual strategy for providing support to patients with COPD that incorporates peer and health care professional support. The study had minimal exclusion criteria. If shown effective, the study offers a program of peer support that can be readily implemented in health care settings.
AB - Background: Self-management support (SMS) for patients with COPD can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, it remains unclear what SMS strategies are most effective. Using peer support to advance self-management is promising, as peer supporters possess credibility and can serve as role models. Methods: We conducted a single-blinded RCT comparing the effectiveness of two strategies to support patients with COPD. The strategies were ‘Health Care Professional (HCP)’ and ‘HCP Plus Peer’ support. Peer support was provided by patients with COPD who have stopped smoking, completed an acute pulmonary rehabilitation program, and met the requirements for becoming a peer supporter. We enrolled patients receiving treatment at inpatient and outpatient settings. Patients were encouraged to invite one family-caregiver to enroll with them. The primary outcome measure was the change in HRQOL at 6 months post enrollment. Secondary outcomes included COPD-related and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Caregiver outcomes included preparedness for caregiving, caregiver stress, and coping. Results: A total of 292 patients as well as 50 family-caregivers were enrolled. The average patient age was 67.3 yrs. (SD 9.4), 61% were female and 26% were African-Americans. The majority of caregivers were females (68%) and were a spouse/partner (58%). Discussion: This study tested a dual strategy for providing support to patients with COPD that incorporates peer and health care professional support. The study had minimal exclusion criteria. If shown effective, the study offers a program of peer support that can be readily implemented in health care settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085305698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085305698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106023
DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106023
M3 - Article
C2 - 32360887
AN - SCOPUS:85085305698
SN - 1551-7144
VL - 94
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials
M1 - 106023
ER -