TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-Analysis of the Luminal and Basal Subtypes of Bladder Cancer and the Identification of Signature Immunohistochemical Markers for Clinical Use
AU - Dadhania, Vipulkumar
AU - Zhang, Miao
AU - Zhang, Li
AU - Bondaruk, Jolanta
AU - Majewski, Tadeusz
AU - Siefker-Radtke, Arlene
AU - Guo, Charles C.
AU - Dinney, Colin
AU - Cogdell, David E.
AU - Zhang, Shizhen
AU - Lee, Sangkyou
AU - Lee, June G.
AU - Weinstein, John N.
AU - Baggerly, Keith
AU - McConkey, David
AU - Czerniak, Bogdan
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by National Cancer Institute grants R01 CA151489 and P50 CA91846 (Project 1 and Core C) to B.C. V.D. is supported by T32 CA163185 grants. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. The study funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors thank Virginia Hurley and Stephanie Garza for administrative assistance as well as Kim Anh Vu for graphical design.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background It has been suggested that bladder cancer can be divided into two molecular subtypes referred to as luminal and basal with distinct clinical behaviors and sensitivities to chemotherapy. We aimed to validate these subtypes in several clinical cohorts and identify signature immunohistochemical markers that would permit simple and cost-effective classification of the disease in primary care centers. Methods We analyzed genomic expression profiles of bladder cancer in three cohorts of fresh frozen tumor samples: MD Anderson (n = 132), Lund (n = 308), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 408) to validate the expression signatures of luminal and basal subtypes and relate them to clinical follow-up data. We also used an MD Anderson cohort of archival bladder tumor samples (n = 89) and a parallel tissue microarray to identify immunohistochemical markers that permitted the molecular classification of bladder cancer. Findings Bladder cancers could be assigned to two candidate intrinsic molecular subtypes referred to here as luminal and basal in all of the datasets analyzed. Luminal tumors were characterized by the expression signature similar to the intermediate/superficial layers of normal urothelium. They showed the upregulation of PPARγ target genes and the enrichment for FGFR3, ELF3, CDKN1A, and TSC1 mutations. In addition, luminal tumors were characterized by the overexpression of E-Cadherin, HER2/3, Rab-25, and Src. Basal tumors showed the expression signature similar to the basal layer of normal urothelium. They showed the upregulation of p63 target genes, the enrichment for TP53 and RB1 mutations, and overexpression of CD49, Cyclin B1, and EGFR. Survival analyses showed that the muscle-invasive basal bladder cancers were more aggressive when compared to luminal cancers. The immunohistochemical expressions of only two markers, luminal (GATA3) and basal (KRT5/6), were sufficient to identify the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer with over 90% accuracy. Interpretation The molecular subtypes of bladder cancer have distinct clinical behaviors and sensitivities to chemotherapy, and a simple two-marker immunohistochemical classifier can be used for prognostic and therapeutic stratification. Funding U.S. National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Health.
AB - Background It has been suggested that bladder cancer can be divided into two molecular subtypes referred to as luminal and basal with distinct clinical behaviors and sensitivities to chemotherapy. We aimed to validate these subtypes in several clinical cohorts and identify signature immunohistochemical markers that would permit simple and cost-effective classification of the disease in primary care centers. Methods We analyzed genomic expression profiles of bladder cancer in three cohorts of fresh frozen tumor samples: MD Anderson (n = 132), Lund (n = 308), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 408) to validate the expression signatures of luminal and basal subtypes and relate them to clinical follow-up data. We also used an MD Anderson cohort of archival bladder tumor samples (n = 89) and a parallel tissue microarray to identify immunohistochemical markers that permitted the molecular classification of bladder cancer. Findings Bladder cancers could be assigned to two candidate intrinsic molecular subtypes referred to here as luminal and basal in all of the datasets analyzed. Luminal tumors were characterized by the expression signature similar to the intermediate/superficial layers of normal urothelium. They showed the upregulation of PPARγ target genes and the enrichment for FGFR3, ELF3, CDKN1A, and TSC1 mutations. In addition, luminal tumors were characterized by the overexpression of E-Cadherin, HER2/3, Rab-25, and Src. Basal tumors showed the expression signature similar to the basal layer of normal urothelium. They showed the upregulation of p63 target genes, the enrichment for TP53 and RB1 mutations, and overexpression of CD49, Cyclin B1, and EGFR. Survival analyses showed that the muscle-invasive basal bladder cancers were more aggressive when compared to luminal cancers. The immunohistochemical expressions of only two markers, luminal (GATA3) and basal (KRT5/6), were sufficient to identify the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer with over 90% accuracy. Interpretation The molecular subtypes of bladder cancer have distinct clinical behaviors and sensitivities to chemotherapy, and a simple two-marker immunohistochemical classifier can be used for prognostic and therapeutic stratification. Funding U.S. National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Health.
KW - Biomarker
KW - Bladder cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992650854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992650854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.036
DO - 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 27612592
AN - SCOPUS:84992650854
SN - 2352-3964
VL - 12
SP - 105
EP - 117
JO - EBioMedicine
JF - EBioMedicine
ER -