TY - JOUR
T1 - MEGSA
T2 - A Powerful and Flexible Framework for Analyzing Mutual Exclusivity of Tumor Mutations
AU - Hua, Xing
AU - Hyland, Paula L.
AU - Huang, Jing
AU - Song, Lei
AU - Zhu, Bin
AU - Caporaso, Neil E.
AU - Landi, Maria Teresa
AU - Chatterjee, Nilanjan
AU - Shi, Jianxin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The American Society of Human Genetics.
PY - 2016/3/3
Y1 - 2016/3/3
N2 - The central challenges in tumor sequencing studies is to identify driver genes and pathways, investigate their functional relationships, and nominate drug targets. The efficiency of these analyses, particularly for infrequently mutated genes, is compromised when subjects carry different combinations of driver mutations. Mutual exclusivity analysis helps address these challenges. To identify mutually exclusive gene sets (MEGS), we developed a powerful and flexible analytic framework based on a likelihood ratio test and a model selection procedure. Extensive simulations demonstrated that our method outperformed existing methods for both statistical power and the capability of identifying the exact MEGS, particularly for highly imbalanced MEGS. Our method can be used for de novo discovery, for pathway-guided searches, or for expanding established small MEGS. We applied our method to the whole-exome sequencing data for 13 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We identified multiple previously unreported non-pairwise MEGS in multiple cancer types. For acute myeloid leukemia, we identified a MEGS with five genes (FLT3, IDH2, NRAS, KIT, and TP53) and a MEGS (NPM1, TP53, and RUNX1) whose mutation status was strongly associated with survival (p = 6.7 × 10-4). For breast cancer, we identified a significant MEGS consisting of TP53 and four infrequently mutated genes (ARID1A, AKT1, MED23, and TBL1XR1), providing support for their role as cancer drivers.
AB - The central challenges in tumor sequencing studies is to identify driver genes and pathways, investigate their functional relationships, and nominate drug targets. The efficiency of these analyses, particularly for infrequently mutated genes, is compromised when subjects carry different combinations of driver mutations. Mutual exclusivity analysis helps address these challenges. To identify mutually exclusive gene sets (MEGS), we developed a powerful and flexible analytic framework based on a likelihood ratio test and a model selection procedure. Extensive simulations demonstrated that our method outperformed existing methods for both statistical power and the capability of identifying the exact MEGS, particularly for highly imbalanced MEGS. Our method can be used for de novo discovery, for pathway-guided searches, or for expanding established small MEGS. We applied our method to the whole-exome sequencing data for 13 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We identified multiple previously unreported non-pairwise MEGS in multiple cancer types. For acute myeloid leukemia, we identified a MEGS with five genes (FLT3, IDH2, NRAS, KIT, and TP53) and a MEGS (NPM1, TP53, and RUNX1) whose mutation status was strongly associated with survival (p = 6.7 × 10-4). For breast cancer, we identified a significant MEGS consisting of TP53 and four infrequently mutated genes (ARID1A, AKT1, MED23, and TBL1XR1), providing support for their role as cancer drivers.
KW - driver genes
KW - mutual exclusivity
KW - oncogenic pathways
KW - tumor sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960082742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960082742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 26899600
AN - SCOPUS:84960082742
SN - 0002-9297
VL - 98
SP - 442
EP - 455
JO - American journal of human genetics
JF - American journal of human genetics
IS - 3
ER -