TY - JOUR
T1 - Medical Care of Adults with down Syndrome
T2 - A Clinical Guideline
AU - Tsou, Amy Y.
AU - Bulova, Peter
AU - Capone, George
AU - Chicoine, Brian
AU - Gelaro, Bryn
AU - Harville, Terry Odell
AU - Martin, Barry A.
AU - McGuire, Dennis E.
AU - McKelvey, Kent D.
AU - Peterson, Moya
AU - Tyler, Carl
AU - Wells, Michael
AU - Whitten, Michelle Sie
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This work was funded and
Funding Information:
reported receiving grants from the LuMind Foundation and serving on the board of directors of the Down Syndrome Medical Interest Group–USA (DSMIG-USA), the steering committee of the Down Syndrome International Health Guideline Project, the clinical and scientific advisory board of the National Down Syndrome Society, and the executive committee of the LuMind Down Syndrome–Clinical Trials Network. Dr Chicoine reported receiving personal fees from Woodbine House Publishing, serving as the current treasurer of DSMIG-USA, the clinical advisory board for the National Down Syndrome Society, and the executive committee of the LuMind Down Syndrome–Clinical Trials Network. Drs Bulova, Capone, Chicoine, Martin, McGuire, McKelvey, and Peterson and Mss Gelaro and Whitten are current members of the DSMIG-USA. No other authors reported disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/20
Y1 - 2020/10/20
N2 - Importance: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal condition, and average life expectancy has increased substantially, from 25 years in 1983 to 60 years in 2020. Despite the unique clinical comorbidities among adults with Down syndrome, there are no clinical guidelines for the care of these patients. Objective: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for adults with Down syndrome. Evidence Review: The Global Down Syndrome Foundation Medical Care Guidelines for Adults with Down Syndrome Workgroup (n = 13) developed 10 Population/Intervention/ Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions for adults with Down syndrome addressing multiple clinical areas including mental health (2 questions), dementia, screening or treatment of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, osteoporosis, atlantoaxial instability, thyroid disease, and celiac disease. These questions guided the literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and the TRIP Database, searched from January 1, 2000, to February 26, 2018, with an updated search through August 6, 2020. Using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and the Evidence-to-Decision framework, in January 2019, the 13-member Workgroup and 16 additional clinical and scientific experts, nurses, patient representatives, and a methodologist developed clinical recommendations. A statement of good practice was made when there was a high level of certainty that the recommendation would do more good than harm, but there was little direct evidence. Findings: From 11295 literature citations associated with 10 PICO questions, 20 relevant studies were identified. An updated search identified 2 additional studies, for a total of 22 included studies (3 systematic reviews, 19 primary studies), which were reviewed and synthesized. Based on this analysis, 14 recommendations and 4 statements of good practice were developed. Overall, the evidence base was limited. Only 1 strong recommendation was formulated: screening for Alzheimer-type dementia starting at age 40 years. Four recommendations (managing risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention, screening for obesity, and evaluation for secondary causes of osteoporosis) agreed with existing guidance for individuals without Down syndrome. Two recommendations for diabetes screening recommend earlier initiation of screening and at shorter intervals given the high prevalence and earlier onset in adults with Down syndrome. Conclusions and Relevance: These evidence-based clinical guidelines provide recommendations to support primary care of adults with Down syndrome. The lack of high-quality evidence limits the strength of the recommendations and highlights the need for additional research.
AB - Importance: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal condition, and average life expectancy has increased substantially, from 25 years in 1983 to 60 years in 2020. Despite the unique clinical comorbidities among adults with Down syndrome, there are no clinical guidelines for the care of these patients. Objective: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for adults with Down syndrome. Evidence Review: The Global Down Syndrome Foundation Medical Care Guidelines for Adults with Down Syndrome Workgroup (n = 13) developed 10 Population/Intervention/ Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions for adults with Down syndrome addressing multiple clinical areas including mental health (2 questions), dementia, screening or treatment of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, osteoporosis, atlantoaxial instability, thyroid disease, and celiac disease. These questions guided the literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and the TRIP Database, searched from January 1, 2000, to February 26, 2018, with an updated search through August 6, 2020. Using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and the Evidence-to-Decision framework, in January 2019, the 13-member Workgroup and 16 additional clinical and scientific experts, nurses, patient representatives, and a methodologist developed clinical recommendations. A statement of good practice was made when there was a high level of certainty that the recommendation would do more good than harm, but there was little direct evidence. Findings: From 11295 literature citations associated with 10 PICO questions, 20 relevant studies were identified. An updated search identified 2 additional studies, for a total of 22 included studies (3 systematic reviews, 19 primary studies), which were reviewed and synthesized. Based on this analysis, 14 recommendations and 4 statements of good practice were developed. Overall, the evidence base was limited. Only 1 strong recommendation was formulated: screening for Alzheimer-type dementia starting at age 40 years. Four recommendations (managing risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention, screening for obesity, and evaluation for secondary causes of osteoporosis) agreed with existing guidance for individuals without Down syndrome. Two recommendations for diabetes screening recommend earlier initiation of screening and at shorter intervals given the high prevalence and earlier onset in adults with Down syndrome. Conclusions and Relevance: These evidence-based clinical guidelines provide recommendations to support primary care of adults with Down syndrome. The lack of high-quality evidence limits the strength of the recommendations and highlights the need for additional research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094220817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094220817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.2020.17024
DO - 10.1001/jama.2020.17024
M3 - Article
C2 - 33079159
AN - SCOPUS:85094220817
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 324
SP - 1543
EP - 1556
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 15
ER -