Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and assess a composite measure of physical capacity using self-report and physical performance items. Method: Item response theory (IRT) is used to evaluate measurement properties of self-report and performance items and to develop a composite measure for 7,609 participants in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Results: Self-reports distinguish differences at the lower end of physical capacity but not at mid-to-high levels. Performance-based measures discriminate across a fuller spectrum. An IRT-based composite score, drawing on both, provides increased measurement precision across the physical capacity spectrum and detects age group differences if either self-report or performance does so - suggesting it is better suited for studying age-related changes than either measure alone. Discussion: Self-report and performance measures have different strengths on the physical capacity spectrum. IRT provides a means of combining these different measurement approaches for analyses of physical capacity across a broad range of functioning in later life.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-309 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Aging and Health |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- measurement
- performance tests
- physical capacity
- physical function
- self-reported function
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Life-span and Life-course Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Physical Capacity: An Assessment of a Composite Measure Using Self-Report and Performance-Based Items'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS