Measurement accuracy of different active tracking sequences for interventional MRI

Tobias Wech, Steven M. Shea, Julien Barbot, Kamal Vij, Li Pan, Christine H. Lorenz, Sunil Patil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To compare the spatial accuracy of three typical active tracking sequences using a new, unique phantom design. Materials and Methods Three different tracking sequences (Single Echo, Dual Echo and Hadamard Multiplexed) were compared with each other in a phantom study with respect to their positional accuracy. A custom-built phantom was constructed to conduct the experiments with precise framework conditions which facilitated sufficient measurement accuracy. An electrophysiology catheter incorporating four micro-coils was used as an interventional device. Tracking profiles were acquired in all three spatial dimensions and validated against the distances that were measured by a Vernier caliper in combination with a three-dimensional reference scan. Results The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that all three sequences show < 1.5 mm positional error. The measurement accuracy of Single Echo and Double Echo are prone to off-resonances, whereas Hadamard Encoding is immune to it. Conclusion The developed phantom enabled the performance of objective measurements of the accuracy of different active tracking sequences. The proposed setup allows for objectively contrasting different methods for interventional procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-495
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • active tracking
  • electrophysiological procedures
  • interventional MRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement accuracy of different active tracking sequences for interventional MRI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this