Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention

John E. Lochman; Caroline Boxmeyer; Nicole Powell; David L. Roth; Michael Windle

doi:10.1002/ev.184

Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention

John E. Lochman, Caroline Boxmeyer, Nicole Powell, David L. Roth, Michael Windle

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter describes potential drawbacks of using intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses to examine intervention effects and presents several additional analytic methods as alternatives to ITT.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	19-32
Number of pages	14
Journal	New Directions for Evaluation
Volume	2006
Issue number	110
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.184
State	Published - 2006
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research

Access to Document

10.1002/ev.184

Cite this

@article{0fc8129f4cdf47da9bafce8aab2aa795,

title = "Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention",

abstract = "This chapter describes potential drawbacks of using intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses to examine intervention effects and presents several additional analytic methods as alternatives to ITT.",

author = "Lochman, {John E.} and Caroline Boxmeyer and Nicole Powell and Roth, {David L.} and Michael Windle",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1002/ev.184",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2006",

pages = "19--32",

journal = "New Directions for Evaluation",

issn = "1097-6736",

publisher = "Jossey-Bass Inc.",

number = "110",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Masked intervention effects

T2 - Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention

AU - Lochman, John E.

AU - Boxmeyer, Caroline

AU - Powell, Nicole

AU - Roth, David L.

AU - Windle, Michael

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This chapter describes potential drawbacks of using intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses to examine intervention effects and presents several additional analytic methods as alternatives to ITT.

AB - This chapter describes potential drawbacks of using intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses to examine intervention effects and presents several additional analytic methods as alternatives to ITT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548574796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548574796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ev.184

DO - 10.1002/ev.184

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548574796

SN - 1097-6736

VL - 2006

SP - 19

EP - 32

JO - New Directions for Evaluation

JF - New Directions for Evaluation

IS - 110

ER -

Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this