Managing unplanned pregnancies in five countries: Perspectives on contraception and abortion decisions

Amy O. Tsui, John Casterline, Susheela Singh, Akinrinola Bankole, Ann M. Moore, Adekunbi Kehinde Omideyi, Nancy Palomino, Zeba Sathar, Fatima Juarez, Kristen M. Shellenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


Why is induced abortion common in environments in which modern contraception is readily available? This study analyses qualitative data collected from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with women and men from lowincome areas in five countries - the United States, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru and Mexico - to better understand how couples manage their pregnancy risk. Across all settings, women and men rarely weigh the advantages and disadvantages of contraception and abortion before beginning a sexual relationship or engaging in sexual intercourse. Contraception is viewed independently of abortion, and the two are linked only when the former is invoked as a preferred means to avoiding repeat abortion. For women, contraceptive methods are viewed as suspect because of perceived side effects, while abortion experience, often at significant personal risk to them, raises the spectre of social stigma and motivates better practice of contraception. In all settings, male partners figure importantly in pregnancy decisions and management. Although there are inherent study limitations of small sample sizes, the narratives reveal psychosocial barriers to effective contraceptive use and identify nodal points in pregnancy decisionmaking that can structure future investigations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S1-S24
JournalGlobal public health
Issue numberSUPPL.1
StatePublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • Contraception
  • Contraceptive behaviour
  • Couples
  • Induced abortion
  • Pregnancy
  • Unplanned

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Managing unplanned pregnancies in five countries: Perspectives on contraception and abortion decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this