TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of Gastroschisis
T2 - Timing of Delivery, Antibiotic Usage, and Closure Considerations (A Systematic Review From the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes & Evidence Based Practice Committee)
AU - Slidell, Mark B.
AU - McAteer, Jarod
AU - Miniati, Doug
AU - Sømme, Stig
AU - Wakeman, Derek
AU - Rialon, Kristy
AU - Lucas, Don
AU - Beres, Alana
AU - Chang, Henry
AU - Englum, Brian
AU - Kawaguchi, Akemi
AU - Gonzalez, Katherine
AU - Speck, Elizabeth
AU - Villalona, Gustavo
AU - Kulaylat, Afif
AU - Rentea, Rebecca
AU - Yousef, Yasmine
AU - Darderian, Sarkis
AU - Acker, Shannon
AU - St Peter, Shawn
AU - Kelley-Quon, Lorraine
AU - Baird, Robert
AU - Baerg, Joanne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background: No consensus exists for the initial management of infants with gastroschisis. Methods: The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee (OEBPC) developed three a priori questions about gastroschisis for a qualitative systematic review. We reviewed English-language publications between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019. This project describes the findings of a systematic review of the three questions regarding: 1) optimal delivery timing, 2) antibiotic use, and 3) closure considerations. Results: 1339 articles were screened for eligibility; 92 manuscripts were selected and reviewed. The included studies had a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 4 and recommendation Grades B-D. Twenty-eight addressed optimal timing of delivery, 5 pertained to antibiotic use, and 59 discussed closure considerations (Figure 1). Delivery after 37 weeks post-conceptual age is considered optimal. Prophylactic antibiotics covering skin flora are adequate to reduce infection risk until definitive closure. Studies support primary fascial repair, without staged silo reduction, when abdominal domain and hemodynamics permit. A sutureless repair is safe, effective, and does not delay feeding or extend length of stay. Sedation and intubation are not routinely required for a sutureless closure. Conclusions: Despite the large number of studies addressing the above-mentioned facets of gastroschisis management, the data quality is poor. A wide variation in gastroschisis management was documented, indicating a need for high quality RCTs to provide an evidence-based approach when caring for these infants. Type of Study: Qualitative systematic review of Level 1–4 studies.
AB - Background: No consensus exists for the initial management of infants with gastroschisis. Methods: The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidenced-based Practice Committee (OEBPC) developed three a priori questions about gastroschisis for a qualitative systematic review. We reviewed English-language publications between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2019. This project describes the findings of a systematic review of the three questions regarding: 1) optimal delivery timing, 2) antibiotic use, and 3) closure considerations. Results: 1339 articles were screened for eligibility; 92 manuscripts were selected and reviewed. The included studies had a Level of Evidence that ranged from 2 to 4 and recommendation Grades B-D. Twenty-eight addressed optimal timing of delivery, 5 pertained to antibiotic use, and 59 discussed closure considerations (Figure 1). Delivery after 37 weeks post-conceptual age is considered optimal. Prophylactic antibiotics covering skin flora are adequate to reduce infection risk until definitive closure. Studies support primary fascial repair, without staged silo reduction, when abdominal domain and hemodynamics permit. A sutureless repair is safe, effective, and does not delay feeding or extend length of stay. Sedation and intubation are not routinely required for a sutureless closure. Conclusions: Despite the large number of studies addressing the above-mentioned facets of gastroschisis management, the data quality is poor. A wide variation in gastroschisis management was documented, indicating a need for high quality RCTs to provide an evidence-based approach when caring for these infants. Type of Study: Qualitative systematic review of Level 1–4 studies.
KW - Abdominal wall defect
KW - Antibiotics
KW - Gastroschisis
KW - Gestational age
KW - Outcomes
KW - Perinatal care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194058177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194058177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.044
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.044
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38796391
AN - SCOPUS:85194058177
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 59
SP - 1408
EP - 1417
JO - Journal of pediatric surgery
JF - Journal of pediatric surgery
IS - 8
ER -