TY - JOUR
T1 - Maize, cattle and mosquitoes
T2 - The political economy of malaria epidemics in colonial swaziland
AU - Packard, Randall M.
N1 - Funding Information:
A disease of equal importance in this context is malaria. Yet the relationship between the changing incidence of malaria and the dual processes of industrialization and rural under-development in the lowland areas of southern Africa is only partially understood. While a number of studies have linked upsurges in both the morbidity and mortality associated with malaria to specific developmental changes, such as shifts in settlement patterns, house types, farming practices, communication patterns, the organization of labour, water use patterns and insecticide use, few have attempted to relate these changes to the wider political economy in which they occur.6 Thus the 1 Research for this study was carried out in Swaziland during 1982 and was supported by research grants under the Fulbright-Hays Program administered by the Department of Education and the Council for the International Exchange of Scholars. I wish to thank both agencies for their support. I also wish to thank Drs Charles van Onselen, Alan Booth, Jonathan Crush and Albert Henn M.D. for their comments on earlier drafts of this study. * Colin Bundy, The Rise and Fall of the South African Peasantry (London, 1979); R. Palmer and N. Parsons, The Roots of Rural Poverty in Central and Southern Africa (London, 1977); H. Alverson, Mind in the Heart of Darkness (New Haven, 1976); Colin Murray, Families Divided (Cambridge, 1981); Shula Marks and R. Rathbone, Industrialization and Social Change in South Africa (London, 1982). 3 L. Vail, 'Ecology and history: the example of eastern Zambia', Journal of Southern African Studies, m (1977), 129-55. 4 Hilda Kuper, Uniform of Colour (Johannesburg, 1947); I. Schapera, Migrant Labour and Tribal Life (London, 1947); G. Prins, 'Disease at the crossroads: toward a history of therapeutics in Bulozi since 1876', Social Science and medicine, vol. 13B, 4 (1979). 5 The list of such studies is too extensive to cite here. Persons interested in the relationship between development and malaria are encouraged to consult the World Health Organization-sponsored bibliography compiled by Jaqueline Sotiroff-Junker, A Bibliography on the Behavioural, Social, and Economic Aspects of Malaria and its Control (Geneva, 1978).
PY - 1984/4
Y1 - 1984/4
N2 - Malaria was a major health problem in Swaziland during the colonial period. Prior to the commencement of vector control measures in the late 1940s annual outbreaks of malaria occurred during the summer and autumn months from December to May. These seasonal epidemics incapacitated large numbers of Swazis as well as a few Europeans. During most years the epidemic was limited to the lower regions of the country and was marked by relatively few deaths. In other years, however, the annual epidemic spread throughout the country and was accompanied by a high rate of mortality especially among young children. Colonial medical opinion ascribed these major epidemics to abnormally heavy rainfall and increased vector breeding. Yet they were also a product of long-term trends in the Swaziland political economy-the semi-proletarianization of Swazi herdsmen/cultivators and the subordination of Swazi economic interests to those of South African and local European capital-which produced a state of nutritional vulnerability among many Swazi families. This, vulnerability in combination with short-term economic crises, such as the worldwide depression of the early 1930s, and drought, gave rise to famine conditions which greatly increased the severity of subsequent outbreaks of malaria, as seen in the histories of the major epidemics of 1932 and 1946. 74These three years clearly illustrate how the occurrence of regional epidemics depended on a combination of several factors, the absence of any one of which could act to reduce the level of malaria in the country. In 1917–18 the occurrence of drought conditions and the loss of crops was followed by excessive rains. However, a strong cattle market allowed the Swazi to offset the loss of their crops. Moreover, the rains in 1918 were so excessive that they inhibited the breeding of the Anopheles gambiae mosquito, which breeds in shallow hoofprints, potholes and ditches. In years of heavy rain such as occurred in 1918 these breeding places are repeatedly swept clean, disturbing the breeding sites and reducing the mosquito population. Excessive rains also appear to have accounted for the limited outbreak which occurred in 1925 despite the occurrence of famine conditions in the months preceding the outbreak of malaria. The epidemic of 1920, like that of 1918, was limited by the ability of the Swazi to sell their cattle. Moreover, there was no depression in employment opportunities as occurred in 1931 and to a lesser extent in 1945. The Swazi were therefore able to cope with the loss of their crops more successfully and were less vulnerable to malaria.
AB - Malaria was a major health problem in Swaziland during the colonial period. Prior to the commencement of vector control measures in the late 1940s annual outbreaks of malaria occurred during the summer and autumn months from December to May. These seasonal epidemics incapacitated large numbers of Swazis as well as a few Europeans. During most years the epidemic was limited to the lower regions of the country and was marked by relatively few deaths. In other years, however, the annual epidemic spread throughout the country and was accompanied by a high rate of mortality especially among young children. Colonial medical opinion ascribed these major epidemics to abnormally heavy rainfall and increased vector breeding. Yet they were also a product of long-term trends in the Swaziland political economy-the semi-proletarianization of Swazi herdsmen/cultivators and the subordination of Swazi economic interests to those of South African and local European capital-which produced a state of nutritional vulnerability among many Swazi families. This, vulnerability in combination with short-term economic crises, such as the worldwide depression of the early 1930s, and drought, gave rise to famine conditions which greatly increased the severity of subsequent outbreaks of malaria, as seen in the histories of the major epidemics of 1932 and 1946. 74These three years clearly illustrate how the occurrence of regional epidemics depended on a combination of several factors, the absence of any one of which could act to reduce the level of malaria in the country. In 1917–18 the occurrence of drought conditions and the loss of crops was followed by excessive rains. However, a strong cattle market allowed the Swazi to offset the loss of their crops. Moreover, the rains in 1918 were so excessive that they inhibited the breeding of the Anopheles gambiae mosquito, which breeds in shallow hoofprints, potholes and ditches. In years of heavy rain such as occurred in 1918 these breeding places are repeatedly swept clean, disturbing the breeding sites and reducing the mosquito population. Excessive rains also appear to have accounted for the limited outbreak which occurred in 1925 despite the occurrence of famine conditions in the months preceding the outbreak of malaria. The epidemic of 1920, like that of 1918, was limited by the ability of the Swazi to sell their cattle. Moreover, there was no depression in employment opportunities as occurred in 1931 and to a lesser extent in 1945. The Swazi were therefore able to cope with the loss of their crops more successfully and were less vulnerable to malaria.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021534345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021534345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0021853700022854
DO - 10.1017/S0021853700022854
M3 - Article
C2 - 11617234
AN - SCOPUS:0021534345
SN - 0021-8537
VL - 25
SP - 189
EP - 212
JO - Journal of African History
JF - Journal of African History
IS - 2
ER -