TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia enhances radiation therapy
T2 - A study in mouse models of human prostate cancer
AU - Attaluri, Anilchandra
AU - Kandala, Sri Kamal
AU - Wabler, Michele
AU - Zhou, Haoming
AU - Cornejo, Christine
AU - Armour, Michael
AU - Hedayati, Mohammad
AU - Zhang, Yonggang
AU - DeWeese, Theodore L.
AU - Herman, Cila
AU - Ivkov, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
R. Ivkov is an inventor on several issued and pending patents that disclose nanoparticle formulations for imaging and hyperthermia. All patents on which R. Ivkov is an inventor are assigned to either Johns Hopkins University or Aduro Biotech. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. This work was funded by an award from the Safeway Foundation and the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and by a donation from David H. Koch. ICP-MS work was supported in part by the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund Program at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the NIEHS Center, P30 ES00319. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Partial support for S. K. Kandala and C. Herman was provided by the National Institutes of Health, NCI Grant No. R01CA161265. Additional support for animal facilities at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center was provided by the NCI/NIH P30 CA006973.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose: We aimed to characterise magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (mNPH) with radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. Methods: Human prostate cancer subcutaneous tumours, PC3 and LAPC-4, were grown in nude male mice. When tumours measured 150 mm3 magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) were injected into tumours to a target dose of 5.5 mg Fe/cm3 tumour, and treated 24 h later by exposure to alternating magnetic field (AMF). Mice were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts to characterise (1) intratumour MIONP distribution, (2) effects of variable thermal dose mNPH (fixed AMF peak amplitude 24 kA/m at 160 ± 5 kHz) with/without RT (5 Gy), (3) effects of RT (RT5: 5 Gy; RT8: 8 Gy), and (4) fixed thermal dose mNPH (43 °C for 20 min) with/without RT (5 Gy). MIONP concentration and distribution were assessed following sacrifice and tissue harvest using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Prussian blue staining, respectively. Tumour growth was monitored and compared among treated groups. Results: LAPC-4 tumours retained higher MIONP concentration and more uniform distribution than did PC3 tumours. AMF power modulation provided similar thermal dose for mNPH and combination therapy groups (CEM43: LAPC-4: 33.6 ± 3.4 versus 25.9 ± 0.8, and PC3: 27.19 ± 0.7 versus 27.50 ± 0.6), thereby overcoming limitations of MIONP distribution and yielding statistically significant tumour growth delay. Conclusion: PC3 and LAPC-4 tumours represent two biological models that demonstrate different patterns of nanoparticle retention and distribution, offering a model to make comparisons of these effects for mNPH. Modulating power for mNPH offers potential to overcome limitations of MIONP distribution to enhance mNPH.
AB - Purpose: We aimed to characterise magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (mNPH) with radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. Methods: Human prostate cancer subcutaneous tumours, PC3 and LAPC-4, were grown in nude male mice. When tumours measured 150 mm3 magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) were injected into tumours to a target dose of 5.5 mg Fe/cm3 tumour, and treated 24 h later by exposure to alternating magnetic field (AMF). Mice were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts to characterise (1) intratumour MIONP distribution, (2) effects of variable thermal dose mNPH (fixed AMF peak amplitude 24 kA/m at 160 ± 5 kHz) with/without RT (5 Gy), (3) effects of RT (RT5: 5 Gy; RT8: 8 Gy), and (4) fixed thermal dose mNPH (43 °C for 20 min) with/without RT (5 Gy). MIONP concentration and distribution were assessed following sacrifice and tissue harvest using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Prussian blue staining, respectively. Tumour growth was monitored and compared among treated groups. Results: LAPC-4 tumours retained higher MIONP concentration and more uniform distribution than did PC3 tumours. AMF power modulation provided similar thermal dose for mNPH and combination therapy groups (CEM43: LAPC-4: 33.6 ± 3.4 versus 25.9 ± 0.8, and PC3: 27.19 ± 0.7 versus 27.50 ± 0.6), thereby overcoming limitations of MIONP distribution and yielding statistically significant tumour growth delay. Conclusion: PC3 and LAPC-4 tumours represent two biological models that demonstrate different patterns of nanoparticle retention and distribution, offering a model to make comparisons of these effects for mNPH. Modulating power for mNPH offers potential to overcome limitations of MIONP distribution to enhance mNPH.
KW - Hyperthermia
KW - Magnetic nanoparticles
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Radiation therapy
KW - Radiosensitiser
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930977640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930977640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/02656736.2015.1005178
DO - 10.3109/02656736.2015.1005178
M3 - Article
C2 - 25811736
AN - SCOPUS:84930977640
SN - 0265-6736
VL - 31
SP - 359
EP - 374
JO - International Journal of Hyperthermia
JF - International Journal of Hyperthermia
IS - 4
ER -